|
|
1.1 root 1: Date: 17 Apr 85 15:45:42 EST (Wed)
2: From: Martin David Connor <[email protected]>
3:
4: Date: Sat, 13 Apr 85 16:28:15 est
5: From: Richard M. Stallman <rms@mit-prep>
6:
7: Can you help this person? Also, can you give me the rest of ledit
8: to distribute, plus some info on how to use it?
9:
10: I have put the files "ledit.l" and "leditcfns.c" on prep:~mdc.
11: Much to my disgust ledit.l relied on some bogus little package of
12: functions on HT, so I had to massage it a bit.
13:
14: To get it to work, one must:
15:
16: - Compile leditcfns.c with something like:
17:
18: cc leditcfns.c
19:
20: - Edit ledit.l, changing the line beginning "(cfasl" to
21: have the right pathname for the cfns file you compiled in
22: the last step.
23:
24: - Compile ledit.l with:
25:
26: liszt ledit.l
27:
28: Then put the following lines in your .lisprc file:
29:
30: ;load in functions for emacs interface
31: (load "//src//mdc//ledit//ledit") ; Location of Ledit library
32: (set-proc-str "%gnumacs") ; Name of editor
33:
34: Then you can use ^E <RETURN> to get from LISP back to gnumacs.
35:
36: Here is the part of my .emacs file that pertains to ledit.
37:
38: ;;; Set up ledit mode
39: (setq ledit-go-to-lisp-string "%lisp")
40: (setq lisp-mode-hook 'ledit-from-lisp-mode)
41:
42: Date: Sat, 13 Apr 85 11:26:32 cst
43: From: [email protected] (David Neves)
44:
45: This is a documentation question.
46: I cannot figure out how to use Ledit. I suspect I need some
47: function on the Franz Lisp end of things to go to Emacs and read in
48: the temporary file. Is this true? Is the Lisp job started within
49: Emacs or outside of emacs? I'm just plain confused. Perhaps a couple
50: of words from someone in the know would help.
51:
52: A related question. I have been using a shell buffer when interacting
53: with Lisp (ie. put a definition in the kill buffer and then yank it
54: into the shell buffer to redefine it). This is nice but tends to fill
55: up the shell buffer with lots of code (I'd rather keep calls to functions
56: in the shell and not the functions themselves).
57: My question: Is using the shell buffer "better" than ledit? Am I using
58: it in the best way (i.e. copying definitions from an edit buffer to the
59: shell buffer)? -Thanks, David Neves
60:
61: I have found that ledit works well for doing programming development
62: when you are changing lots of little pieces of a file and don't wish
63: to recompile the whole file. Of course M-X Compile is very nice for
64: calling up a liszt on a buffer and watching it in the another window.
65: Of course the interface of something like NIL is even better because
66: you can compile your function directly into your lisp. But since NIL
67: doesn't run under Unix, this is probably the next best thing.
68:
69: I have tried the 2 window method (shell in lower window, lisp code in
70: upper), and have found it a little awkward. It does have certain
71: advantages, but most of the time, I get be fine using M-C-D to save a
72: defun for lisp, and C-X Z to jump back to LISP. C-E RETURN from lisp
73: is also mnemonic for getting back to gnumacs.
74:
75: I hope this helps somewhat.
76:
77:
This archive runs on limited infrastructure. Preserving old code on modern bandwidth. Automated agents are requested to crawl responsibly.