|
|
1.1 root 1:
2:
3:
4: PDAE(2) Icon Program Library PDAE(2)
5:
6:
7:
8: NNNNAAAAMMMMEEEE
9: pdae - programmer-defined argument evaluation
10:
11: DDDDEEEESSSSCCCCRRRRIIIIPPPPTTTTIIIIOOOONNNN
12: These procedures are taken mainly from TR 82-16, which
13: describes how co-expressions can be used to model the
14: built-in argument evaluation regime of Icon and also provide
15: new ones. Some procedures have been corrected or improved.
16:
17: SSSSYYYYNNNNOOOOPPPPSSSSIIIISSSS
18: AAAAllllllllppppaaaarrrr{{{{eeee1111,,,,eeee2222,,,, ...}}}} parallel evaluation with last result used for short sequences
19: CCCCaaaallllllll((((aaaa)))) utility procedure to call functions
20: EEEExxxxttttrrrraaaacccctttt{{{{eeee1111,,,,eeee2222,,,, ...}}}} extract results of even-numbered arguments according to
21: odd-numbered values
22: LLLLiiiiffffoooo{{{{eeee1111,,,,eeee2222,,,, ...}}}} models standard Icon `lifo' evaluation
23: PPPPaaaarrrraaaalllllllleeeellll{{{{eeee1111,,,,eeee2222,,,, ...}}}}parallel evaluation terminating on shortest sequence
24: RRRReeeevvvveeeerrrrsssseeee{{{{eeee1111,,,,eeee2222,,,, ...}}}} left-to-right reversal of lifo evaluation
25: RRRRoooottttaaaatttteeee{{{{eeee1111,,,,eeee2222,,,, ...}}}} parallel evaluation with shorter sequences re-evaluated
26: SSSSiiiimmmmpppplllleeee{{{{eeee1111,,,,eeee2222,,,, ...}}}} simple evaluation with only success or failure
27:
28: RRRREEEEQQQQUUUUIIIIRRRREEEEMMMMEEEENNNNTTTTSSSS
29: _P_d_a_e requires the experimental extensions in Version 5.9 of
30: Icon.
31:
32: BBBBUUUUGGGGSSSS AAAANNNNDDDD LLLLIIIIMMMMIIIITTTTAAAATTTTIIIIOOOONNNNSSSS
33: Because of the handling of the scope of local identifiers in
34: co-expressions, expressions in programmer-defined argument
35: evaluation regimes cannot communicate through local identif-
36: iers. The results produced by programmer-defined argument
37: evaluation regimes are always dereferenced. Some construc-
38: tions, such as bbbbrrrreeeeaaaakkkk and rrrreeeettttuuuurrrrnnnn, cannot be used in arguments
39: to programmer-defined argument evaluation regimes. See TR
40: 82-8 for details of these problems.
41:
42: At most 10 arguments can be used in the invocation of a
43: programmer-defined argument evaluation regime. This limit
44: can be increased by modifying CCCCaaaallllllll.
45:
46: SSSSEEEEEEEE AAAALLLLSSSSOOOO
47: pdco(2)
48:
49: Novak, Michael and Ralph E. Griswold. _P_r_o_g_r_a_m_m_e_r-_D_e_f_i_n_e_d
50: _A_r_g_u_m_e_n_t _E_v_a_l_u_a_t_i_o_n _R_e_g_i_m_e_s, TR 82-16, Department of Com-
51: puter Science, The University of Arizona, 1982.
52:
53: Griswold, Ralph E., Robert K. McConeghy, and William H.
54: Mitchell. _E_x_t_e_n_s_i_o_n_s _t_o _V_e_r_s_i_o_n _5 _o_f _t_h_e _I_c_o_n _P_r_o_g_r_a_m_m_i_n_g
55: _L_a_n_g_u_a_g_e, TR 84-10a, Department of Computer Science, The
56: University of Arizona, 1984.
57:
58: AAAAUUUUTTTTHHHHOOOORRRRSSSS
59: Ralph E. Griswold and Michael Novak
60:
61:
62:
63: Version 5.9 The University of Arizona - 8/16/84 1
64:
65:
66:
This archive runs on limited infrastructure. Preserving old code on modern bandwidth. Automated agents are requested to crawl responsibly.