Annotation of 43BSD/usr.lib/learn/morefiles/L4.1d, revision 1.1.1.1

1.1       root        1: #print
                      2: Unix has several rather simple programs that are useful
                      3: in their own right and as building blocks in more complicated
                      4: operations.   One of the most frequently used is "wc",
                      5: which counts lines, words, and characters in files.
                      6: If you say
                      7:   wc file
                      8: or 
                      9:   wc <file
                     10: wc will print three numbers: the number of
                     11: lines, words and characters in the file.
                     12: (Some systems have an obsolete version of "wc" that
                     13: doesn't count the characters.)
                     14: If there is more than one file, as in
                     15:   wc file1 file2 file3 file4
                     16: then wc will list the counts for each file separately,
                     17: and the total.
                     18: 
                     19: What is the total number of words
                     20: in the two files whose names begin with "memo"?
                     21: Type "answer N", where N is the number of words.
                     22: #create memo1
                     23:    It has been mentioned as one of the advantages to be expected
                     24: from the cooperation of the Senate, in the business
                     25: of appointments, that it would contribute to the
                     26: stability of the administration.  The consent of that body
                     27: would be necessary to displace as well as to appoint.  A
                     28: change of the Chief Magistrate, therefore, would not occasion
                     29: so violent or so general a revolution in the officers
                     30: of the government as might be expected if he were the
                     31: sole disposer of offices.  Where a man in any station had
                     32: given satisfactory evidence of his fitness for it, a new
                     33: President would be restrained from attempting a change
                     34: in favor of a person more agreeable to him by the apprehension
                     35: that a discountenance of the Senate might frustrate
                     36: the attempt, and bring some degree of discredit
                     37: upon himself.  Those who can best estimate the value of
                     38: a steady administration will be most disposed to prize a
                     39: provision which connects the official existence of public
                     40: men with the approbation or disapprobation of that body
                     41: which, from the greater permanency of its own composition,
                     42: will in all probability be less subject to inconstancy
                     43: than any other member of the government.
                     44:    To this union of the Senate with the President, in the
                     45: article of appointments, it has in some cases been suggested
                     46: that it would serve to give the President an undue
                     47: influence over the Senate, and in others that it would
                     48: have an opposite tendency - a strong proof that neither
                     49: suggestion is true.
                     50:    To state the first in its proper form is to refute it.  It
                     51: amounts to this:  the President would have an improper
                     52: influence over the Senate, because the Senate would
                     53: have the power of restraining him.  This is an absurdity in
                     54: terms.  It cannot admit of a doubt that the entire power
                     55: of appointment would enable him much more effectually
                     56: to establish a dangerous empire over that body than a
                     57: mere power of nomination subject to their control.
                     58:     Let us take a view of the converse of the proposition:
                     59: "the Senate would influence the executive."  As I have
                     60: had occasion to remark in several other instances, the indistinctness
                     61: of the objection forbids a precise answer.  In
                     62: what manner is this influence to be exerted?  In relation
                     63: to what objects?  The power of influencing a person, in
                     64: the sense in which it is here used, must imply a power of
                     65: conferring a benefit upon him.  How could the Senate
                     66: confer a benefit upon the President by the manner of employing
                     67: their right of negative upon his nominations?  If it
                     68: be said they might sometimes gratify him by an acquiescence
                     69: in a favorite choice, when public motives might dictate a
                     70: different conduct, I answer that the instances in which the
                     71: President could be personally interested in the result would
                     72: be too few to admit of his being materially affected by the
                     73: #create memo2
                     74: compliances of the Senate.  Besides this, it is evident that
                     75: the POWER which can originate the disposition of honors
                     76: and emoluments is more likely to attract than to be attracted
                     77: by the POWER which can merely obstruct their
                     78: course.  If by influencing the President be want restraining
                     79: him, this is precisely what must have been intended.
                     80: And it has been shown that the restraint would be salutary,
                     81: at the same time that it would not be such as to
                     82: destroy a single advantage to be looked for from the uncontrolled
                     83: agency of that magistrate.  The right of nomination
                     84: would produce all the good, without the ill.
                     85:    Upon a comparison of the plan for the appointment of
                     86: the officers of the proposed government with that which
                     87: is established by the constitution of this State, a decided
                     88: preference must be given to the former.  In that plan the
                     89: power of nomination is unequivocally vested in the executive.
                     90: And as there would be a necessity for submitting
                     91: each nomination to the judgment of an entire branch of
                     92: the legislature, the circumstances attending an appointment,
                     93: from the mode of conducting it, would naturally
                     94: become matters of notoriety, and the public would
                     95: be at no loss to determine what part had been performed
                     96: by the different actors.  The blame of a bad nomination
                     97: would fall upon the President singly and absolutely.  The
                     98: censure of rejecting a good one would lie entirely at the
                     99: door of the senate, aggravated by the consideration
                    100: of their having counteracted the good intentions of the
                    101: executive.  If an ill appointment should be made, the executive,
                    102: for nominating, and the Senate, for approving,
                    103: would participate, though in different degrees, in the
                    104: opprobrium and disgrace.
                    105:    The reverse of all this characterizes the manner of appointment
                    106: in this State.  The council of appointment consists
                    107: of from three to five persons, of whom the governor
                    108: is always one.  This small body, shut up in a private
                    109: apartment, impenetrable to the public eye, proceed to the
                    110: execution of the trust committed to them.  It is known
                    111: that the governor claims the right of nomination upon
                    112: the strength of some ambiguous expressions in the Constitution;
                    113: but it is not known to what extent, or in what
                    114: manner he exercises it; nor upon what occasions he is
                    115: contradicted or opposed.  The censure of a bad appointment,
                    116: on account of the uncertainty of its author and for
                    117: want of a determinate object, has neither poignancy nor
                    118: duration.  And while an unbounded field for cabal and intrigue
                    119: lies open, all idea of responsibility is lost.  The
                    120: most that the public can know is that the governor
                    121: claims the right of nomination; that two out of the inconsiderable
                    122: number of four men can too often be managed
                    123: without much difficulty; that if some of the members of a
                    124: #copyin
                    125: #user
                    126: #uncopyin
                    127: #match 949
                    128: #log
                    129: #next
                    130: 4.1e 10

unix.superglobalmegacorp.com

This archive runs on limited infrastructure. Preserving old code on modern bandwidth. Automated agents are requested to crawl responsibly.