Annotation of 43BSDReno/contrib/emacs-18.55/etc/MOTIVATION, revision 1.1.1.1

1.1       root        1: STUDIES FIND REWARD OFTEN NO MOTIVATOR
                      2: 
                      3: Creativity and intrinsic interest diminish if task is done for gain
                      4: 
                      5: By Alfie Kohn
                      6: Special to the Boston Globe
                      7: [reprinted with permission of the author
                      8:  from the Monday 19 January 1987 Boston Globe]
                      9: 
                     10: In the laboratory, rats get Rice Krispies.  In the classroom the top
                     11: students get A's, and in the factory or office the best workers get
                     12: raises.  It's an article of faith for most of us that rewards promote
                     13: better performance.
                     14: 
                     15: But a growing body of research suggests that this law is not nearly as
                     16: ironclad as was once thought.  Psychologists have been finding that
                     17: rewards can lower performance levels, especially when the performance
                     18: involves creativity.
                     19: 
                     20: A related series of studies shows that intrinsic interest in a task -
                     21: the sense that something is worth doing for its own sake - typically
                     22: declines when someone is rewarded for doing it.
                     23: 
                     24: If a reward - money, awards, praise, or winning a contest - comes to
                     25: be seen as the reason one is engaging in an activity, that activity
                     26: will be viewed as less enjoyable in its own right.
                     27: 
                     28: With the exception of some behaviorists who doubt the very existence
                     29: of intrinsic motivation, these conclusions are now widely accepted
                     30: among psychologists.  Taken together, they suggest we may unwittingly
                     31: be squelching interest and discouraging innovation among workers,
                     32: students and artists.
                     33: 
                     34: The recognition that rewards can have counter-productive effects is
                     35: based on a variety of studies, which have come up with such findings
                     36: as these: Young children who are rewarded for drawing are less likely
                     37: to draw on their own that are children who draw just for the fun of
                     38: it.  Teenagers offered rewards for playing word games enjoy the games
                     39: less and do not do as well as those who play with no rewards.
                     40: Employees who are praised for meeting a manager's expectations suffer
                     41: a drop in motivation.
                     42: 
                     43: Much of the research on creativity and motivation has been performed
                     44: by Theresa Amabile, associate professor of psychology at Brandeis
                     45: University.  In a paper published early last year on her most recent
                     46: study, she reported on experiments involving elementary school and
                     47: college students.  Both groups were asked to make "silly" collages.
                     48: The young children were also asked to invent stories.
                     49: 
                     50: The least-creative projects, as rated by several teachers, were done
                     51: by those students who had contracted for rewards.  "It may be that
                     52: commissioned work will, in general, be less creative than work that is
                     53: done out of pure interest," Amabile said.
                     54: 
                     55: In 1985, Amabile asked 72 creative writers at Brandeis and at Boston
                     56: University to write poetry.  Some students then were given a list of
                     57: extrinsic (external) reasons for writing, such as impressing teachers,
                     58: making money and getting into graduate school, and were asked to think
                     59: about their own writing with respect to these reasons.  Others were
                     60: given a list of intrinsic reasons:  the enjoyment of playing with
                     61: words, satisfaction from self-expression, and so forth.  A third group
                     62: was not given any list.  All were then asked to do more writing.
                     63: 
                     64: The results were clear.  Students given the extrinsic reasons not only
                     65: wrote less creatively than the others, as judged by 12 independent
                     66: poets, but the quality of their work dropped significantly.  Rewards,
                     67: Amabile says, have this destructive effect primarily with creative
                     68: tasks, including higher-level problem-solving.  "The more complex the
                     69: activity, the more it's hurt by extrinsic reward," she said.
                     70: 
                     71: But other research shows that artists are by no means the only ones
                     72: affected.
                     73: 
                     74: In one study, girls in the fifth and sixth grades tutored younger
                     75: children much less effectively if they were promised free movie
                     76: tickets for teaching well.  The study, by James Gabarino, now
                     77: president of Chicago's Erikson Institute for Advanced Studies in Child
                     78: Development, showed that tutors working for the reward took longer to
                     79: communicate ideas, got frustrated more easily, and did a poorer job in
                     80: the end than those who were not rewarded.
                     81: 
                     82: Such findings call into question the widespread belief that money is
                     83: an effective and even necessary way to motivate people.  They also
                     84: challenge the behaviorist assumption that any activity is more likely
                     85: to occur if it is rewarded.  Amabile says her research "definitely
                     86: refutes the notion that creativity can be operantly conditioned."
                     87: 
                     88: But Kenneth McGraw, associate professor of psychology at the
                     89: University of Mississippi, cautions that this does not mean
                     90: behaviorism itself has been invalidated.  "The basic principles of
                     91: reinforcement and rewards certainly work, but in a restricted context"
                     92: - restricted, that is, to tasks that are not especially interesting.
                     93: 
                     94: Researchers offer several explanations for their surprising findings
                     95: about rewards and performance.
                     96: 
                     97: First, rewards encourage people to focus narrowly on a task, to do it
                     98: as quickly as possible and to take few risks.  "If they feel that
                     99: 'this is something I hve to get through to get the prize,' the're
                    100: going to be less creative," Amabile said.
                    101: 
                    102: Second, people come to see themselves as being controlled by the
                    103: reward.  They feel less autonomous, and this may interfere with
                    104: performance.  "To the extent one's experience of being
                    105: self-determined is limited," said Richard Ryan, associate psychology
                    106: professor at the University of Rochester, "one's creativity will be
                    107: reduced as well."
                    108: 
                    109: Finally, extrinsic rewards can erode intrinsic interest.  People who
                    110: see themselves as working for money, approval or competitive success
                    111: find their tasks less pleasurable, and therefore do not do them as
                    112: well.
                    113: 
                    114: The last explanation reflects 15 years of work by Ryan's mentor at the
                    115: University of Rochester, Edward Deci.  In 1971, Deci showed that
                    116: "money may work to buy off one's intrinsic motivation for an activity"
                    117: on a long-term basis.  Ten years later, Deci and his colleagues
                    118: demonstrated that trying to best others has the same effect.  Students
                    119: who competed to solve a puzzle quickly were less likely than those who
                    120: were not competing to keep working at it once the experiment was over.
                    121: 
                    122: Control plays role
                    123: 
                    124: There is general agreement, however, that not all rewards have the
                    125: same effect.  Offering a flat fee for participating in an experiment -
                    126: similar to an hourly wage in the workplace - usually does not reduce
                    127: intrinsic motivation.  It is only when the rewards are based on
                    128: performing a given task or doing a good job at it - analogous to
                    129: piece-rate payment and bonuses, respectively - that the problem
                    130: develops.
                    131: 
                    132: The key, then, lies in how a reward is experienced.  If we come to
                    133: view ourselves as working to get something, we will no longer find
                    134: that activity worth doing in its own right.
                    135: 
                    136: There is an old joke that nicely illustrates the principle.  An
                    137: elderly man, harassed by the taunts of neighborhood children, finally
                    138: devises a scheme.  He offered to pay each child a dollar if they would
                    139: all return Tuesday and yell their insults again.  They did so eagerly
                    140: and received the money, but he told them he could only pay 25 cents on
                    141: Wednesday.  When they returned, insulted him again and collected their
                    142: quarters, he informed them that Thursday's rate would be just a penny.
                    143: "Forget it," they said - and never taunted him again.
                    144: 
                    145: Means to and end
                    146: 
                    147: In a 1982 study, Stanford psychologist Mark L. Lepper showed that any
                    148: task, no matter how enjoyable it once seemed, would be devalued if it
                    149: were presented as a means rather than an end.  He told a group of
                    150: preschoolers they could not engage in one activity they liked until
                    151: they first took part in another.  Although they had enjoyed both
                    152: activities equally, the children came to dislike the task that was a
                    153: prerequisite for the other.
                    154: 
                    155: It should not be surprising that when verbal feedback is experienced
                    156: as controlling, the effect on motivation can be similar to that of
                    157: payment.  In a study of corporate employees, Ryan found that those who
                    158: were told, "Good, you're doing as you /should/" were "significantly
                    159: less intrinsically motivated than those who received feedback
                    160: informationally."
                    161: 
                    162: There's a difference, Ryan says, between saying, "I'm giving you this
                    163: reward because I recognize the value of your work" and "You're getting
                    164: this reward because you've lived up to my standards."
                    165: 
                    166: A different but related set of problems exists in the case of
                    167: creativity.  Artists must make a living, of course, but Amabile
                    168: emphasizes that "the negative impact on creativity of working for
                    169: rewards can be minimized" by playing down the significance of these
                    170: rewards and trying not to use them in a controlling way.  Creative
                    171: work, the research suggests, cannot be forced, but only allowed to
                    172: happen.
                    173: 
                    174: /Alfie Kohn, a Cambridge, MA writer, is the author of "No Contest: The
                    175: Case Against Competition," recently published by Houghton Mifflin Co.,
                    176: Boston, MA.  ISBN 0-395-39387-6. /

unix.superglobalmegacorp.com

This archive runs on limited infrastructure. Preserving old code on modern bandwidth. Automated agents are requested to crawl responsibly.