|
|
1.1 ! root 1: ! 2: ! 3: Network Working Group J. Postel ! 4: Request for Comments: 920 J. Reynolds ! 5: ISI ! 6: October 1984 ! 7: ! 8: Domain Requirements ! 9: ! 10: ! 11: Status of this Memo ! 12: ! 13: This memo is a policy statement on the requirements of establishing a ! 14: new domain in the ARPA-Internet and the DARPA research community. ! 15: This is an official policy statement of the IAB and the DARPA. ! 16: Distribution of this memo is unlimited. ! 17: ! 18: Introduction ! 19: ! 20: This memo restates and refines the requirements on establishing a ! 21: Domain first described in RFC-881 [1]. It adds considerable detail ! 22: to that discussion, and introduces the limited set of top level ! 23: domains. ! 24: ! 25: The Purpose of Domains ! 26: ! 27: Domains are administrative entities. The purpose and expected use of ! 28: domains is to divide the name management required of a central ! 29: administration and assign it to sub-administrations. There are no ! 30: geographical, topological, or technological constraints on a domain. ! 31: The hosts in a domain need not have common hardware or software, nor ! 32: even common protocols. Most of the requirements and limitations on ! 33: domains are designed to ensure responsible administration. ! 34: ! 35: The domain system is a tree-structured global name space that has a ! 36: few top level domains. The top level domains are subdivided into ! 37: second level domains. The second level domains may be subdivided ! 38: into third level domains, and so on. ! 39: ! 40: The administration of a domain requires controlling the assignment of ! 41: names within that domain and providing access to the names and name ! 42: related information (such as addresses) to users both inside and ! 43: outside the domain. ! 44: ! 45: ! 46: ! 47: ! 48: ! 49: ! 50: ! 51: ! 52: ! 53: ! 54: ! 55: ! 56: Postel & Reynolds [Page 1] ! 57: ! 58: ! 59: ! 60: RFC 920 October 1984 ! 61: Domain Requirements ! 62: ! 63: ! 64: General Purpose Domains ! 65: ! 66: While the initial domain name "ARPA" arises from the history of the ! 67: development of this system and environment, in the future most of the ! 68: top level names will be very general categories like "government", ! 69: "education", or "commercial". The motivation is to provide an ! 70: organization name that is free of undesirable semantics. ! 71: ! 72: After a short period of initial experimentation, all current ! 73: ARPA-Internet hosts will select some domain other than ARPA for their ! 74: future use. The use of ARPA as a top level domain will eventually ! 75: cease. ! 76: ! 77: Initial Set of Top Level Domains ! 78: ! 79: The initial top level domain names are: ! 80: ! 81: Temporary ! 82: ! 83: ARPA = The current ARPA-Internet hosts. ! 84: ! 85: Categories ! 86: ! 87: GOV = Government, any government related domains meeting the ! 88: second level requirements. ! 89: ! 90: EDU = Education, any education related domains meeting the ! 91: second level requirements. ! 92: ! 93: COM = Commercial, any commercial related domains meeting the ! 94: second level requirements. ! 95: ! 96: MIL = Military, any military related domains meeting the ! 97: second level requirements. ! 98: ! 99: ORG = Organization, any other domains meeting the second ! 100: level requirements. ! 101: ! 102: Countries ! 103: ! 104: The English two letter code (alpha-2) identifying a country ! 105: according the the ISO Standard for "Codes for the ! 106: Representation of Names of Countries" [5]. ! 107: ! 108: ! 109: ! 110: ! 111: ! 112: ! 113: Postel & Reynolds [Page 2] ! 114: ! 115: ! 116: ! 117: RFC 920 October 1984 ! 118: Domain Requirements ! 119: ! 120: ! 121: Multiorganizations ! 122: ! 123: A multiorganization may be a top level domain if it is large, ! 124: and is composed of other organizations; particularly if the ! 125: multiorganization can not be easily classified into one of the ! 126: categories and is international in scope. ! 127: ! 128: Possible Examples of Domains ! 129: ! 130: The following examples are fictions of the authors' creation, any ! 131: similarity to the real world is coincidental. ! 132: ! 133: The UC Domain ! 134: ! 135: It might be that a large state wide university with, say, nine ! 136: campuses and several laboratories may want to form a domain. Each ! 137: campus or major off-campus laboratory might then be a subdomain, ! 138: and within each subdomain, each department could be further ! 139: distinguished. This university might be a second level domain in ! 140: the education category. ! 141: ! 142: One might see domain style names for hosts in this domain like ! 143: these: ! 144: ! 145: LOCUS.CS.LA.UC.EDU ! 146: CCN.OAC.LA.UC.EDU ! 147: ERNIE.CS.CAL.UC.EDU ! 148: A.S1.LLNL.UC.EDU ! 149: A.LAND.LANL.UC.EDU ! 150: NMM.LBL.CAL.UC.EDU ! 151: ! 152: The MIT Domain ! 153: ! 154: Another large university may have many hosts using a variety of ! 155: machine types, some even using several families of protocols. ! 156: However, the administrators at this university may see no need for ! 157: the outside world to be aware of these internal differences. This ! 158: university might be a second level domain in the education ! 159: category. ! 160: ! 161: One might see domain style names for hosts in this domain like ! 162: these: ! 163: ! 164: APIARY-1.MIT.EDU ! 165: BABY-BLUE.MIT.EDU ! 166: CEZANNE.MIT.EDU ! 167: DASH.MIT.EDU ! 168: ! 169: ! 170: Postel & Reynolds [Page 3] ! 171: ! 172: ! 173: ! 174: RFC 920 October 1984 ! 175: Domain Requirements ! 176: ! 177: ! 178: MULTICS.MIT.EDU ! 179: TAC.MIT.EDU ! 180: XX.MIT.EDU ! 181: ! 182: The CSNET Domain ! 183: ! 184: There may be a consortium of universities and industry research ! 185: laboratories called, say, "CSNET". This CSNET is not a network ! 186: per se, but rather a computer mail exchange using a variety of ! 187: protocols and network systems. Therefore, CSNET is not a network ! 188: in the sense of the ARPANET, or an Ethernet, or even the ! 189: ARPA-Internet, but rather a community. Yet it does, in fact, have ! 190: the key property needed to form a domain; it has a responsible ! 191: administration. This consortium might be large enough and might ! 192: have membership that cuts across the categories in such a way that ! 193: it qualifies under the "multiorganization rule" to be a top level ! 194: domain. ! 195: ! 196: One might see domain style names for hosts in this domain like ! 197: these: ! 198: ! 199: CIC.CSNET ! 200: EMORY.CSNET ! 201: GATECH.CSNET ! 202: HP-LABS.CSNET ! 203: SJ.IBM.CSNET ! 204: UDEL.CSNET ! 205: UWISC.CSNET ! 206: ! 207: General Requirements on a Domain ! 208: ! 209: There are several requirements that must be met to establish a ! 210: domain. In general, it must be responsibly managed. There must be a ! 211: responsible person to serve as an authoritative coordinator for ! 212: domain related questions. There must be a robust domain name lookup ! 213: service, it must be of at least a minimum size, and the domain must ! 214: be registered with the central domain administrator (the Network ! 215: Information Center (NIC) Domain Registrar). ! 216: ! 217: Responsible Person: ! 218: ! 219: An individual must be identified who has authority for the ! 220: administration of the names within the domain, and who seriously ! 221: takes on the responsibility for the behavior of the hosts in the ! 222: domain, plus their interactions with hosts outside the domain. ! 223: This person must have some technical expertise and the authority ! 224: within the domain to see that problems are fixed. ! 225: ! 226: ! 227: Postel & Reynolds [Page 4] ! 228: ! 229: ! 230: ! 231: RFC 920 October 1984 ! 232: Domain Requirements ! 233: ! 234: ! 235: If a host in a given domain somehow misbehaves in its interactions ! 236: with hosts outside the domain (e.g., consistently violates ! 237: protocols), the responsible person for the domain must be ! 238: competent and available to receive reports of problems, take ! 239: action on the reported problems, and follow through to eliminate ! 240: the problems. ! 241: ! 242: Domain Servers: ! 243: ! 244: A robust and reliable domain server must be provided. One way of ! 245: meeting this requirement is to provide at least two independent ! 246: domain servers for the domain. The database can, of course, be ! 247: the same. The database can be prepared and copied to each domain ! 248: server. But, the servers should be in separate machines on ! 249: independent power supplies, et cetera; basically as physically ! 250: independent as can be. They should have no common point of ! 251: failure. ! 252: ! 253: Some domains may find that providing a robust domain service can ! 254: most easily be done by cooperating with another domain where each ! 255: domain provides an additional server for the other. ! 256: ! 257: In other situations, it may be desirable for a domain to arrange ! 258: for domain service to be provided by a third party, perhaps on ! 259: hosts located outside the domain. ! 260: ! 261: One of the difficult problems in operating a domain server is the ! 262: acquisition and maintenance of the data. In this case, the data ! 263: are the host names and addresses. In some environments this ! 264: information changes fairly rapidly and keeping up-to-date data may ! 265: be difficult. This is one motivation for sub-domains. One may ! 266: wish to create sub-domains until the rate of change of the data in ! 267: a sub-domain domain server database is easily managed. ! 268: ! 269: In the technical language of the domain server implementation the ! 270: data is divided into zones. Domains and zones are not necessarily ! 271: one-to-one. It may be reasonable for two or more domains to ! 272: combine their data in a single zone. ! 273: ! 274: The responsible person or an identified technical assistant must ! 275: understand in detail the procedures for operating a domain server, ! 276: including the management of master files and zones. ! 277: ! 278: The operation of a domain server should not be taken on lightly. ! 279: There are some difficult problems in providing an adequate ! 280: service, primarily the problems in keeping the database up to ! 281: date, and keeping the service operating. ! 282: ! 283: ! 284: Postel & Reynolds [Page 5] ! 285: ! 286: ! 287: ! 288: RFC 920 October 1984 ! 289: Domain Requirements ! 290: ! 291: ! 292: The concepts and implementation details of the domain server are ! 293: given in RFC-882 [2] and RFC-883 [3]. ! 294: ! 295: Minimum Size: ! 296: ! 297: The domain must be of at least a minimum size. There is no ! 298: requirement to form a domain because some set of hosts is above ! 299: the minimum size. ! 300: ! 301: Top level domains must be specially authorized. In general, they ! 302: will only be authorized for domains expected to have over 500 ! 303: hosts. ! 304: ! 305: The general guideline for a second level domain is that it have ! 306: over 50 hosts. This is a very soft "requirement". It makes sense ! 307: that any major organization, such as a university or corporation, ! 308: be allowed as a second level domain -- even if it has just a few ! 309: hosts. ! 310: ! 311: Registration: ! 312: ! 313: Top level domains must be specially authorized and registered with ! 314: the NIC domain registrar. ! 315: ! 316: The administrator of a level N domain must register with the ! 317: registrar (or responsible person) of the level N-1 domain. This ! 318: upper level authority must be satisfied that the requirements are ! 319: met before authorization for the domain is granted. ! 320: ! 321: The registration procedure involves answering specific questions ! 322: about the prospective domain. A prototype of what the NIC Domain ! 323: Registrar may ask for the registration of a second level domain is ! 324: shown below. These questions may change from time to time. It is ! 325: the responsibility of domain administrators to keep this ! 326: information current. ! 327: ! 328: The administrator of a domain is required to make sure that host ! 329: and sub-domain names within that jurisdiction conform to the ! 330: standard name conventions and are unique within that domain. ! 331: ! 332: If sub-domains are set up, the administrator may wish to pass ! 333: along some of his authority and responsibility to a sub-domain ! 334: administrator. Even if sub-domains are established, the ! 335: responsible person for the top-level domain is ultimately ! 336: responsible for the whole tree of sub-domains and hosts. ! 337: ! 338: This does not mean that a domain administrator has to know the ! 339: ! 340: ! 341: Postel & Reynolds [Page 6] ! 342: ! 343: ! 344: ! 345: RFC 920 October 1984 ! 346: Domain Requirements ! 347: ! 348: ! 349: details of all the sub-domains and hosts to the Nth degree, but ! 350: simply that if a problem occurs he can get it fixed by calling on ! 351: the administrator of the sub-domain containing the problem. ! 352: ! 353: Top Level Domain Requirements ! 354: ! 355: There are very few top level domains, each of these may have many ! 356: second level domains. ! 357: ! 358: An initial set of top level names has been identified. Each of these ! 359: has an administrator and an agent. ! 360: ! 361: The top level domains: ! 362: ! 363: ARPA = The ARPA-Internet *** TEMPORARY *** ! 364: ! 365: Administrator: DARPA ! 366: Agent: The Network Information Center ! 367: Mailbox: [email protected] ! 368: ! 369: GOV = Government ! 370: ! 371: Administrator: DARPA ! 372: Agent: The Network Information Center ! 373: Mailbox: [email protected] ! 374: ! 375: EDU = Education ! 376: ! 377: Administrator: DARPA ! 378: Agent: The Network Information Center ! 379: Mailbox: [email protected] ! 380: ! 381: COM = Commercial ! 382: ! 383: Administrator: DARPA ! 384: Agent: The Network Information Center ! 385: Mailbox: [email protected] ! 386: ! 387: MIL = Military ! 388: ! 389: Administrator: DDN-PMO ! 390: Agent: The Network Information Center ! 391: Mailbox: [email protected] ! 392: ! 393: ! 394: ! 395: ! 396: ! 397: ! 398: Postel & Reynolds [Page 7] ! 399: ! 400: ! 401: ! 402: RFC 920 October 1984 ! 403: Domain Requirements ! 404: ! 405: ! 406: ORG = Organization ! 407: ! 408: Administrator: DARPA ! 409: Agent: The Network Information Center ! 410: Mailbox: [email protected] ! 411: ! 412: Countries ! 413: ! 414: The English two letter code (alpha-2) identifying a country ! 415: according the the ISO Standard for "Codes for the ! 416: Representation of Names of Countries" [5]. ! 417: ! 418: As yet no country domains have been established. As they are ! 419: established information about the administrators and agents ! 420: will be made public, and will be listed in subsequent editions ! 421: of this memo. ! 422: ! 423: Multiorganizations ! 424: ! 425: A multiorganization may be a top level domain if it is large, ! 426: and is composed of other organizations; particularly if the ! 427: multiorganization can not be easily classified into one of the ! 428: categories and is international in scope. ! 429: ! 430: As yet no multiorganization domains have been established. As ! 431: they are established information about the administrators and ! 432: agents will be made public, and will be listed in subsequent ! 433: editions of this memo. ! 434: ! 435: Note: The NIC is listed as the agent and registrar for all the ! 436: currently allowed top level domains. If there are other entities ! 437: that would be more appropriate agents and registrars for some or ! 438: all of these domains then it would be desirable to reassign the ! 439: responsibility. ! 440: ! 441: Second Level Domain Requirements ! 442: ! 443: Each top level domain may have many second level domains. Every ! 444: second level domain must meet the general requirements on a domain ! 445: specified above, and be registered with a top level domain ! 446: administrator. ! 447: ! 448: ! 449: ! 450: ! 451: ! 452: ! 453: ! 454: ! 455: Postel & Reynolds [Page 8] ! 456: ! 457: ! 458: ! 459: RFC 920 October 1984 ! 460: Domain Requirements ! 461: ! 462: ! 463: Third through Nth Level Domain Requirements ! 464: ! 465: Each second level domain may have many third level domains, etc. ! 466: Every third level domain (through Nth level domain) must meet the ! 467: requirements set by the administrator of the immediately higher level ! 468: domain. Note that these may be more or less strict than the general ! 469: requirements. One would expect the minimum size requirements to ! 470: decrease at each level. ! 471: ! 472: The ARPA Domain ! 473: ! 474: At the time the implementation of the domain concept was begun it was ! 475: thought that the set of hosts under the administrative authority of ! 476: DARPA would make up a domain. Thus the initial domain selected was ! 477: called ARPA. Now it is seen that there is no strong motivation for ! 478: there to be a top level ARPA domain. The plan is for the current ! 479: ARPA domain to go out of business as soon as possible. Hosts that ! 480: are currently members of the ARPA domain should make arrangements to ! 481: join another domain. It is likely that for experimental purposes ! 482: there will be a second level domain called ARPA in the ORG domain ! 483: (i.e., there will probably be an ARPA.ORG domain). ! 484: ! 485: The DDN Hosts ! 486: ! 487: DDN hosts that do not desire to participate in this domain naming ! 488: system will continue to use the HOSTS.TXT data file maintained by the ! 489: NIC for name to address translations. This file will be kept up to ! 490: date for the DDN hosts. However, all DDN hosts will change their ! 491: names from "host.ARPA" to (for example) "host.DDN.MIL" some time in ! 492: the future. The schedule for changes required in DDN hosts will be ! 493: established by the DDN-PMO. ! 494: ! 495: Impact on Hosts ! 496: ! 497: What is a host administrator to do about all this? ! 498: ! 499: For existing hosts already operating in the ARPA-Internet, the ! 500: best advice is to sit tight for now. Take a few months to ! 501: consider the options, then select a domain to join. Plan ! 502: carefully for the impact that changing your host name will have on ! 503: both your local users and on their remote correspondents. ! 504: ! 505: For a new host, careful thought should be given (as discussed ! 506: below). Some guidance can be obtained by comparing notes on what ! 507: other hosts with similar administrative properties have done. ! 508: ! 509: The owner of a host may decide which domain to join, and the ! 510: ! 511: ! 512: Postel & Reynolds [Page 9] ! 513: ! 514: ! 515: ! 516: RFC 920 October 1984 ! 517: Domain Requirements ! 518: ! 519: ! 520: administrator of a domain may decide which hosts to accept into his ! 521: domain. Thus the owner of a host and a domain administrator must ! 522: come to an understanding about the host being in the domain. This is ! 523: the foundation of responsible administration. ! 524: ! 525: For example, a host "XYZ" at MIT might possible be considered as a ! 526: candidate for becoming any of XYZ.ARPA.ORG, XYZ.CSNET, or ! 527: XYZ.MIT.EDU. ! 528: ! 529: The owner of host XYZ may choose which domain to join, ! 530: depending on which domain administrators are willing to have ! 531: him. ! 532: ! 533: The domain is part of the host name. Thus if USC-ISIA.ARPA changes ! 534: its domain affiliation to DDN.MIL to become USC-ISIA.DDN.MIL, it has ! 535: changed its name. This means that any previous references to ! 536: USC-ISIA.ARPA are now out of date. Such old references may include ! 537: private host name to address tables, and any recorded information ! 538: about mailboxes such as mailing lists, the headers of old messages, ! 539: printed directories, and peoples' memories. ! 540: ! 541: The experience of the DARPA community suggests that changing the name ! 542: of a host is somewhat painful. It is recommended that careful ! 543: thought be given to choosing a new name for a host - which includes ! 544: selecting its place in the domain hierarchy. ! 545: ! 546: The Roles of the Network Information Center ! 547: ! 548: The NIC plays two types of roles in the administration of domains. ! 549: First, the NIC is the registrar of all top level domains. Second ! 550: the NIC is the administrator of several top level domains (and the ! 551: registrar for second level domains in these). ! 552: ! 553: Top Level Domain Registrar ! 554: ! 555: As the registrar for top level domains, the NIC is the contact ! 556: point for investigating the possibility of establishing a new top ! 557: level domain. ! 558: ! 559: Top Level Domain Administrator ! 560: ! 561: For the top level domains designated so far, the NIC is the ! 562: administrator of each of these domains. This means the NIC is ! 563: responsible for the management of these domains and the ! 564: registration of the second level domains or hosts (if at the ! 565: second level) in these domains. ! 566: ! 567: ! 568: ! 569: Postel & Reynolds [Page 10] ! 570: ! 571: ! 572: ! 573: RFC 920 October 1984 ! 574: Domain Requirements ! 575: ! 576: ! 577: It may be reasonable for the administration of some of these ! 578: domains to be taken on by other authorities in the future. It is ! 579: certainly not desired that the NIC be the administrator of all top ! 580: level domains forever. ! 581: ! 582: Prototypical Questions ! 583: ! 584: To establish a domain, the following information must be provided to ! 585: the NIC Domain Registrar ([email protected]): ! 586: ! 587: Note: The key people must have computer mail mailboxes and ! 588: NIC-Idents. If they do not at present, please remedy the ! 589: situation at once. A NIC-Ident may be established by contacting ! 590: [email protected]. ! 591: ! 592: 1) The name of the top level domain to join. ! 593: ! 594: For example: EDU ! 595: ! 596: 2) The name, title, mailing address, phone number, and organization ! 597: of the administrative head of the organization. This is the contact ! 598: point for administrative and policy questions about the domain. In ! 599: the case of a research project, this should be the Principal ! 600: Investigator. The online mailbox and NIC-Ident of this person should ! 601: also be included. ! 602: ! 603: For example: ! 604: ! 605: Administrator ! 606: ! 607: Organization USC/Information Sciences Institute ! 608: Name Keith Uncapher ! 609: Title Executive Director ! 610: Mail Address USC/ISI ! 611: 4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 1001 ! 612: Marina del Rey, CA. 90292-6695 ! 613: Phone Number 213-822-1511 ! 614: Net Mailbox [email protected] ! 615: NIC-Ident KU ! 616: ! 617: 3) The name, title, mailing address, phone number, and organization ! 618: of the domain technical contact. The online mailbox and NIC-Ident of ! 619: the domain technical contact should also be included. This is the ! 620: contact point for problems with the domain and for updating ! 621: information about the domain. Also, the domain technical contact may ! 622: be responsible for hosts in this domain. ! 623: ! 624: ! 625: ! 626: Postel & Reynolds [Page 11] ! 627: ! 628: ! 629: ! 630: RFC 920 October 1984 ! 631: Domain Requirements ! 632: ! 633: ! 634: For example: ! 635: ! 636: Technical Contact ! 637: ! 638: Organization USC/Information Sciences Institute ! 639: Name Craig Milo Rogers ! 640: Title Researcher ! 641: Mail Address USC/ISI ! 642: 4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 1001 ! 643: Marina del Rey, CA. 90292-6695 ! 644: Phone Number 213-822-1511 ! 645: Net Mailbox [email protected] ! 646: NIC-Ident CMR ! 647: ! 648: 4) The name, title, mailing address, phone number, and organization ! 649: of the zone technical contact. The online mailbox and NIC-Ident of ! 650: the zone technical contact should also be included. This is the ! 651: contact point for problems with the zone and for updating information ! 652: about the zone. In many cases the zone technical contact and the ! 653: domain technical contact will be the same person. ! 654: ! 655: For example: ! 656: ! 657: Technical Contact ! 658: ! 659: Organization USC/Information Sciences Institute ! 660: Name Craig Milo Rogers ! 661: Title Researcher ! 662: Mail Address USC/ISI ! 663: 4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 1001 ! 664: Marina del Rey, CA. 90292-6695 ! 665: Phone Number 213-822-1511 ! 666: Net Mailbox [email protected] ! 667: NIC-Ident CMR ! 668: ! 669: 5) The name of the domain (up to 12 characters). This is the name ! 670: that will be used in tables and lists associating the domain and the ! 671: domain server addresses. [While technically domain names can be ! 672: quite long (programmers beware), shorter names are easier for people ! 673: to cope with.] ! 674: ! 675: For example: ALPHA-BETA ! 676: ! 677: 6) A description of the servers that provides the domain service for ! 678: translating name to address for hosts in this domain, and the date ! 679: they will be operational. ! 680: ! 681: ! 682: ! 683: Postel & Reynolds [Page 12] ! 684: ! 685: ! 686: ! 687: RFC 920 October 1984 ! 688: Domain Requirements ! 689: ! 690: ! 691: A good way to answer this question is to say "Our server is ! 692: supplied by person or company X and does whatever their standard ! 693: issue server does". ! 694: ! 695: For example: Our server is a copy of the server operated by ! 696: the NIC, and will be installed and made operational on ! 697: 1-November-84. ! 698: ! 699: 7) A description of the server machines, including: ! 700: ! 701: (a) hardware and software (using keywords from the Assigned ! 702: Numbers) ! 703: ! 704: (b) addresses (what host on what net for each connected net) ! 705: ! 706: For example: ! 707: ! 708: (a) hardware and software ! 709: ! 710: VAX-11/750 and UNIX, or ! 711: IBM-PC and MS-DOS, or ! 712: DEC-1090 and TOPS-20 ! 713: ! 714: (b) address ! 715: ! 716: 10.9.0.193 on ARPANET ! 717: ! 718: 8) An estimate of the number of hosts that will be in the domain. ! 719: ! 720: (a) initially, ! 721: (b) within one year, ! 722: (c) two years, and ! 723: (d) five years. ! 724: ! 725: For example: ! 726: ! 727: (a) initially = 50 ! 728: (b) one year = 100 ! 729: (c) two years = 200 ! 730: (d) five years = 500 ! 731: ! 732: ! 733: ! 734: ! 735: ! 736: ! 737: ! 738: ! 739: ! 740: Postel & Reynolds [Page 13] ! 741: ! 742: ! 743: ! 744: RFC 920 October 1984 ! 745: Domain Requirements ! 746: ! 747: ! 748: Acknowledgment ! 749: ! 750: We would like to thank the many people who contributed to this memo, ! 751: including the participants in the Namedroppers Group, the ICCB, the ! 752: PCCB, and especially the staff of the Network Information Center, ! 753: particularly J. Feinler and K. Harrenstien. ! 754: ! 755: References ! 756: ! 757: [1] Postel, J., "The Domain Names Plan and Schedule", RFC-881, USC ! 758: Information Sciences Institute, November 1983. ! 759: ! 760: [2] Mockapetris, P., "Domain Names - Concepts and Facilities", ! 761: RFC-882, USC Information Sciences Institute, November 1983. ! 762: ! 763: [3] Mockapetris, P., "Domain Names - Implementation and ! 764: Specification", RFC-883, USC Information Sciences Institute, ! 765: November 1983. ! 766: ! 767: [4] Postel, J., "Domain Name System Implementation Schedule", ! 768: RFC-897, USC Information Sciences Institute, February 1984. ! 769: ! 770: [5] ISO, "Codes for the Representation of Names of Countries", ! 771: ISO-3166, International Standards Organization, May 1981. ! 772: ! 773: [6] Postel, J., "Domain Name System Implementation Schedule - ! 774: Revised", RFC-921, USC Information Sciences Institute, October ! 775: 1984. ! 776: ! 777: [7] Mockapetris, P., "The Domain Name System", Proceedings of the ! 778: IFIP 6.5 Working Conference on Computer Message Services, ! 779: Nottingham, England, May 1984. Also as ISI/RS-84-133, ! 780: June 1984. ! 781: ! 782: [8] Mockapetris, P., J. Postel, and P. Kirton, "Name Server Design ! 783: for Distributed Systems", Proceedings of the Seventh ! 784: International Conference on Computer Communication, October 30 ! 785: to November 3 1984, Sidney, Australia. Also as ISI/RS-84-132, ! 786: June 1984. ! 787: ! 788: ! 789: ! 790: ! 791: ! 792: ! 793: ! 794: ! 795: ! 796: ! 797: Postel & Reynolds [Page 14] ! 798:
This archive runs on limited infrastructure. Preserving old code on modern bandwidth. Automated agents are requested to crawl responsibly.