Annotation of GNUtools/bison/REFERENCES, revision 1.1.1.1

1.1       root        1: From phr Tue Jul  8 10:36:19 1986
                      2: Date: Tue, 8 Jul 86 00:52:24 EDT
                      3: From: phr (Paul Rubin)
                      4: To: riferguson%[email protected], tower
                      5: Subject: Re:  Bison documentation?
                      6: 
                      7: The main difference between Bison and Yacc that I know of is that
                      8: Bison supports the @N construction, which gives you access to
                      9: the starting and ending line number and character number associated
                     10: with any of the symbols in the current rule.
                     11: 
                     12: Also, Bison supports the command `%expect N' which says not to mention
                     13: the conflicts if there are N shift/reduce conflicts and no reduce/reduce
                     14: conflicts.
                     15: 
                     16: The differences in the algorithms stem mainly from the horrible
                     17: kludges that Johnson had to perpetrate to make Yacc fit in a PDP-11.
                     18: 
                     19: Also, Bison uses a faster but less space-efficient encoding for the
                     20: parse tables (see Corbett's PhD thesis from Berkeley, "Static
                     21: Semantics in Compiler Error Recovery", June 1985, Report No. UCB/CSD
                     22: 85/251), and more modern technique for generating the lookahead sets.
                     23: (See "Efficient Construction of LALR(1) Lookahead Sets" by F. DeRemer
                     24: and A. Pennello, in ACM TOPLS Vol 4 No 4, October 1982.  Their
                     25: technique is the standard one now.)
                     26: 
                     27:        paul rubin
                     28:        free software foundation
                     29: 
                     30: 

unix.superglobalmegacorp.com

This archive runs on limited infrastructure. Preserving old code on modern bandwidth. Automated agents are requested to crawl responsibly.