--- gcc/gcc.info-11 2018/04/24 18:02:01 1.1.1.4 +++ gcc/gcc.info-11 2018/04/24 18:18:44 1.1.1.7 @@ -1,9 +1,13 @@ -This is Info file gcc.info, produced by Makeinfo-1.49 from the input +This is Info file gcc.info, produced by Makeinfo-1.55 from the input file gcc.texi. This file documents the use and the internals of the GNU compiler. - Copyright (C) 1988, 1989, 1992 Free Software Foundation, Inc. + Published by the Free Software Foundation 675 Massachusetts Avenue +Cambridge, MA 02139 USA + + Copyright (C) 1988, 1989, 1992, 1993, 1994 Free Software Foundation, +Inc. Permission is granted to make and distribute verbatim copies of this manual provided the copyright notice and this permission notice are @@ -11,981 +15,814 @@ preserved on all copies. Permission is granted to copy and distribute modified versions of this manual under the conditions for verbatim copying, provided also -that the sections entitled "GNU General Public License" and "Protect -Your Freedom--Fight `Look And Feel'" are included exactly as in the -original, and provided that the entire resulting derived work is -distributed under the terms of a permission notice identical to this -one. +that the sections entitled "GNU General Public License," "Funding for +Free Software," and "Protect Your Freedom--Fight `Look And Feel'" are +included exactly as in the original, and provided that the entire +resulting derived work is distributed under the terms of a permission +notice identical to this one. Permission is granted to copy and distribute translations of this manual into another language, under the above conditions for modified versions, except that the sections entitled "GNU General Public -License" and "Protect Your Freedom--Fight `Look And Feel'", and this -permission notice, may be included in translations approved by the Free -Software Foundation instead of in the original English. - - -File: gcc.info, Node: Patterns, Next: Example, Prev: Machine Desc, Up: Machine Desc - -Everything about Instruction Patterns -===================================== - - Each instruction pattern contains an incomplete RTL expression, with -pieces to be filled in later, operand constraints that restrict how the -pieces can be filled in, and an output pattern or C code to generate -the assembler output, all wrapped up in a `define_insn' expression. - - A `define_insn' is an RTL expression containing four or five -operands: - - 1. An optional name. The presence of a name indicate that this - instruction pattern can perform a certain standard job for the - RTL-generation pass of the compiler. This pass knows certain - names and will use the instruction patterns with those names, if - the names are defined in the machine description. - - The absence of a name is indicated by writing an empty string - where the name should go. Nameless instruction patterns are never - used for generating RTL code, but they may permit several simpler - insns to be combined later on. - - Names that are not thus known and used in RTL-generation have no - effect; they are equivalent to no name at all. - - 2. The "RTL template" (*note RTL Template::.) is a vector of - incomplete RTL expressions which show what the instruction should - look like. It is incomplete because it may contain - `match_operand', `match_operator', and `match_dup' expressions - that stand for operands of the instruction. - - If the vector has only one element, that element is the template - for the instruction pattern. If the vector has multiple elements, - then the instruction pattern is a `parallel' expression containing - the elements described. - - 3. A condition. This is a string which contains a C expression that - is the final test to decide whether an insn body matches this - pattern. - - For a named pattern, the condition (if present) may not depend on - the data in the insn being matched, but only the - target-machine-type flags. The compiler needs to test these - conditions during initialization in order to learn exactly which - named instructions are available in a particular run. - - For nameless patterns, the condition is applied only when matching - an individual insn, and only after the insn has matched the - pattern's recognition template. The insn's operands may be found - in the vector `operands'. - - 4. The "output template": a string that says how to output matching - insns as assembler code. `%' in this string specifies where to - substitute the value of an operand. *Note Output Template::. - - When simple substitution isn't general enough, you can specify a - piece of C code to compute the output. *Note Output Statement::. - - 5. Optionally, a vector containing the values of attributes for insns - matching this pattern. *Note Insn Attributes::. - - -File: gcc.info, Node: Example, Next: RTL Template, Prev: Patterns, Up: Machine Desc - -Example of `define_insn' -======================== - - Here is an actual example of an instruction pattern, for the -68000/68020. - - (define_insn "tstsi" - [(set (cc0) - (match_operand:SI 0 "general_operand" "rm"))] - "" - "* - { if (TARGET_68020 || ! ADDRESS_REG_P (operands[0])) - return \"tstl %0\"; - return \"cmpl #0,%0\"; }") - - This is an instruction that sets the condition codes based on the -value of a general operand. It has no condition, so any insn whose RTL -description has the form shown may be handled according to this -pattern. The name `tstsi' means "test a `SImode' value" and tells the -RTL generation pass that, when it is necessary to test such a value, an -insn to do so can be constructed using this pattern. - - The output control string is a piece of C code which chooses which -output template to return based on the kind of operand and the specific -type of CPU for which code is being generated. - - `"rm"' is an operand constraint. Its meaning is explained below. - - -File: gcc.info, Node: RTL Template, Next: Output Template, Prev: Example, Up: Machine Desc - -RTL Template for Generating and Recognizing Insns -================================================= - - The RTL template is used to define which insns match the particular -pattern and how to find their operands. For named patterns, the RTL -template also says how to construct an insn from specified operands. - - Construction involves substituting specified operands into a copy of -the template. Matching involves determining the values that serve as -the operands in the insn being matched. Both of these activities are -controlled by special expression types that direct matching and -substitution of the operands. - -`(match_operand:M N PREDICATE CONSTRAINT)' - This expression is a placeholder for operand number N of the insn. - When constructing an insn, operand number N will be substituted - at this point. When matching an insn, whatever appears at this - position in the insn will be taken as operand number N; but it - must satisfy PREDICATE or this instruction pattern will not match - at all. - - Operand numbers must be chosen consecutively counting from zero in - each instruction pattern. There may be only one `match_operand' - expression in the pattern for each operand number. Usually - operands are numbered in the order of appearance in `match_operand' - expressions. - - PREDICATE is a string that is the name of a C function that - accepts two arguments, an expression and a machine mode. During - matching, the function will be called with the putative operand as - the expression and M as the mode argument (if M is not specified, - `VOIDmode' will be used, which normally causes PREDICATE to accept - any mode). If it returns zero, this instruction pattern fails to - match. PREDICATE may be an empty string; then it means no test is - to be done on the operand, so anything which occurs in this - position is valid. - - Most of the time, PREDICATE will reject modes other than M--but - not always. For example, the predicate `address_operand' uses M - as the mode of memory ref that the address should be valid for. - Many predicates accept `const_int' nodes even though their mode is - `VOIDmode'. - - CONSTRAINT controls reloading and the choice of the best register - class to use for a value, as explained later (*note - Constraints::.). - - People are often unclear on the difference between the constraint - and the predicate. The predicate helps decide whether a given - insn matches the pattern. The constraint plays no role in this - decision; instead, it controls various decisions in the case of an - insn which does match. - - On CISC machines, PREDICATE is most often `"general_operand"'. - This function checks that the putative operand is either a - constant, a register or a memory reference, and that it is valid - for mode M. - - For an operand that must be a register, PREDICATE should be - `"register_operand"'. It would be valid to use - `"general_operand"', since the reload pass would copy any - non-register operands through registers, but this would make GNU - CC do extra work, it would prevent invariant operands (such as - constant) from being removed from loops, and it would prevent the - register allocator from doing the best possible job. On RISC - machines, it is usually most efficient to allow PREDICATE to - accept only objects that the constraints allow. - - For an operand that must be a constant, either use - `"immediate_operand"' for PREDICATE, or make the instruction - pattern's extra condition require a constant, or both. You cannot - expect the constraints to do this work! If the constraints allow - only constants, but the predicate allows something else, the - compiler will crash when that case arises. - -`(match_scratch:M N CONSTRAINT)' - This expression is also a placeholder for operand number N and - indicates that operand must be a `scratch' or `reg' expression. - - When matching patterns, this is completely equivalent to - - (match_operand:M N "scratch_operand" PRED) - - but, when generating RTL, it produces a (`scratch':M) expression. - - If the last few expressions in a `parallel' are `clobber' - expressions whose operands are either a hard register or - `match_scratch', the combiner can add them when necessary. *Note - Side Effects::. - -`(match_dup N)' - This expression is also a placeholder for operand number N. It is - used when the operand needs to appear more than once in the insn. - - In construction, `match_dup' behaves exactly like `match_operand': - the operand is substituted into the insn being constructed. But - in matching, `match_dup' behaves differently. It assumes that - operand number N has already been determined by a `match_operand' - appearing earlier in the recognition template, and it matches only - an identical-looking expression. - -`(match_operator:M N PREDICATE [OPERANDS...])' - This pattern is a kind of placeholder for a variable RTL expression - code. - - When constructing an insn, it stands for an RTL expression whose - expression code is taken from that of operand N, and whose - operands are constructed from the patterns OPERANDS. - - When matching an expression, it matches an expression if the - function PREDICATE returns nonzero on that expression *and* the - patterns OPERANDS match the operands of the expression. - - Suppose that the function `commutative_operator' is defined as - follows, to match any expression whose operator is one of the - commutative arithmetic operators of RTL and whose mode is MODE: - - int - commutative_operator (x, mode) - rtx x; - enum machine_mode mode; - { - enum rtx_code code = GET_CODE (x); - if (GET_MODE (x) != mode) - return 0; - return GET_RTX_CLASS (code) == 'c' || code == EQ || code == NE; - } - - Then the following pattern will match any RTL expression consisting - of a commutative operator applied to two general operands: - - (match_operator:SI 3 "commutative_operator" - [(match_operand:SI 1 "general_operand" "g") - (match_operand:SI 2 "general_operand" "g")]) - - Here the vector `[OPERANDS...]' contains two patterns because the - expressions to be matched all contain two operands. - - When this pattern does match, the two operands of the commutative - operator are recorded as operands 1 and 2 of the insn. (This is - done by the two instances of `match_operand'.) Operand 3 of the - insn will be the entire commutative expression: use `GET_CODE - (operands[3])' to see which commutative operator was used. - - The machine mode M of `match_operator' works like that of - `match_operand': it is passed as the second argument to the - predicate function, and that function is solely responsible for - deciding whether the expression to be matched "has" that mode. - - When constructing an insn, argument 3 of the gen-function will - specify the operation (i.e. the expression code) for the - expression to be made. It should be an RTL expression, whose - expression code is copied into a new expression whose operands are - arguments 1 and 2 of the gen-function. The subexpressions of - argument 3 are not used; only its expression code matters. - - When `match_operator' is used in a pattern for matching an insn, - it usually best if the operand number of the `match_operator' is - higher than that of the actual operands of the insn. This improves - register allocation because the register allocator often looks at - operands 1 and 2 of insns to see if it can do register tying. - - There is no way to specify constraints in `match_operator'. The - operand of the insn which corresponds to the `match_operator' - never has any constraints because it is never reloaded as a whole. - However, if parts of its OPERANDS are matched by `match_operand' - patterns, those parts may have constraints of their own. - -`(match_op_dup:M N[OPERANDS...])' - Like `match_dup', except that it applies to operators instead of - operands. When constructing an insn, operand number N will be - substituted at this point. But in matching, `match_op_dup' behaves - differently. It assumes that operand number N has already been - determined by a `match_operator' appearing earlier in the - recognition template, and it matches only an identical-looking - expression. - -`(match_parallel N PREDICATE [SUBPAT...])' - This pattern is a placeholder for an insn that consists of a - `parallel' expression with a variable number of elements. This - expression should only appear at the top level of an insn pattern. - - When constructing an insn, operand number N will be substituted at - this point. When matching an insn, it matches if the body of the - insn is a `parallel' expression with at least as many elements as - the vector of SUBPAT expressions in the `match_parallel', if each - SUBPAT matches the corresponding element of the `parallel', *and* - the function PREDICATE returns nonzero on the `parallel' that is - the body of the insn. It is the responsibility of the predicate - to validate elements of the `parallel' beyond those listed in the - `match_parallel'. - - A typical use of `match_parallel' is to match load and store - multiple expressions, which can contains a variable number of - elements in a `parallel'. For example, - - (define_insn "" - [(match_parallel 0 "load_multiple_operation" - [(set (match_operand:SI 1 "gpc_reg_operand" "=r") - (match_operand:SI 2 "memory_operand" "m")) - (use (reg:SI 179)) - (clobber (reg:SI 179))])] - "" - "loadm 0,0,%1,%2") - - This example comes from `a29k.md'. The function - `load_multiple_operations' is defined in `a29k.c' and checks that - subsequent elements in the `parallel' are the same as the `set' in - the pattern, except that they are referencing subsequent registers - and memory locations. - - An insn that matches this pattern might look like: - - (parallel [(set (reg:SI 20) (mem:SI (reg:SI 100))) - (use (reg:SI 179)) - (clobber (reg:SI 179)) - (set (reg:SI 21) (mem:SI (plus:SI (reg:SI 100) (const_int 4)))) - (set (reg:SI 22) (mem:SI (plus:SI (reg:SI 100) (const_int 8))))]) - -`(match_par_dup N [SUBPAT...])' - Like `match_op_dup', but for `match_parallel' instead of - `match_operator'. - -`(address (match_operand:M N "address_operand" ""))' - This complex of expressions is a placeholder for an operand number - N in a "load address" instruction: an operand which specifies a - memory location in the usual way, but for which the actual operand - value used is the address of the location, not the contents of the - location. - - `address' expressions never appear in RTL code, only in machine - descriptions. And they are used only in machine descriptions that - do not use the operand constraint feature. When operand - constraints are in use, the letter `p' in the constraint serves - this purpose. - - M is the machine mode of the *memory location being addressed*, - not the machine mode of the address itself. That mode is always - the same on a given target machine (it is `Pmode', which normally - is `SImode'), so there is no point in mentioning it; thus, no - machine mode is written in the `address' expression. If some day - support is added for machines in which addresses of different - kinds of objects appear differently or are used differently (such - as the PDP-10), different formats would perhaps need different - machine modes and these modes might be written in the `address' - expression. - - -File: gcc.info, Node: Output Template, Next: Output Statement, Prev: RTL Template, Up: Machine Desc - -Output Templates and Operand Substitution -========================================= - - The "output template" is a string which specifies how to output the -assembler code for an instruction pattern. Most of the template is a -fixed string which is output literally. The character `%' is used to -specify where to substitute an operand; it can also be used to identify -places where different variants of the assembler require different -syntax. - - In the simplest case, a `%' followed by a digit N says to output -operand N at that point in the string. - - `%' followed by a letter and a digit says to output an operand in an -alternate fashion. Four letters have standard, built-in meanings -described below. The machine description macro `PRINT_OPERAND' can -define additional letters with nonstandard meanings. - - `%cDIGIT' can be used to substitute an operand that is a constant -value without the syntax that normally indicates an immediate operand. - - `%nDIGIT' is like `%cDIGIT' except that the value of the constant is -negated before printing. - - `%aDIGIT' can be used to substitute an operand as if it were a -memory reference, with the actual operand treated as the address. This -may be useful when outputting a "load address" instruction, because -often the assembler syntax for such an instruction requires you to -write the operand as if it were a memory reference. - - `%lDIGIT' is used to substitute a `label_ref' into a jump -instruction. - - `%=' outputs a number which is unique to each instruction in the -entire compilation. This is useful for making local labels to be -referred to more than once in a single template that generates multiple -assembler instructions. - - `%' followed by a punctuation character specifies a substitution that -does not use an operand. Only one case is standard: `%%' outputs a `%' -into the assembler code. Other nonstandard cases can be defined in the -`PRINT_OPERAND' macro. You must also define which punctuation -characters are valid with the `PRINT_OPERAND_PUNCT_VALID_P' macro. - - The template may generate multiple assembler instructions. Write -the text for the instructions, with `\;' between them. - - When the RTL contains two operands which are required by constraint -to match each other, the output template must refer only to the -lower-numbered operand. Matching operands are not always identical, and -the rest of the compiler arranges to put the proper RTL expression for -printing into the lower-numbered operand. - - One use of nonstandard letters or punctuation following `%' is to -distinguish between different assembler languages for the same machine; -for example, Motorola syntax versus MIT syntax for the 68000. Motorola -syntax requires periods in most opcode names, while MIT syntax does -not. For example, the opcode `movel' in MIT syntax is `move.l' in -Motorola syntax. The same file of patterns is used for both kinds of -output syntax, but the character sequence `%.' is used in each place -where Motorola syntax wants a period. The `PRINT_OPERAND' macro for -Motorola syntax defines the sequence to output a period; the macro for -MIT syntax defines it to do nothing. - - -File: gcc.info, Node: Output Statement, Next: Constraints, Prev: Output Template, Up: Machine Desc - -C Statements for Generating Assembler Output -============================================ - - Often a single fixed template string cannot produce correct and -efficient assembler code for all the cases that are recognized by a -single instruction pattern. For example, the opcodes may depend on the -kinds of operands; or some unfortunate combinations of operands may -require extra machine instructions. - - If the output control string starts with a `@', then it is actually -a series of templates, each on a separate line. (Blank lines and -leading spaces and tabs are ignored.) The templates correspond to the -pattern's constraint alternatives (*note Multi-Alternative::.). For -example, if a target machine has a two-address add instruction `addr' -to add into a register and another `addm' to add a register to memory, -you might write this pattern: - - (define_insn "addsi3" - [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "general_operand" "=r,m") - (plus:SI (match_operand:SI 1 "general_operand" "0,0") - (match_operand:SI 2 "general_operand" "g,r")))] - "" - "@ - addr %2,%0 - addm %2,%0") - - If the output control string starts with a `*', then it is not an -output template but rather a piece of C program that should compute a -template. It should execute a `return' statement to return the -template-string you want. Most such templates use C string literals, -which require doublequote characters to delimit them. To include these -doublequote characters in the string, prefix each one with `\'. - - The operands may be found in the array `operands', whose C data type -is `rtx []'. - - It is very common to select different ways of generating assembler -code based on whether an immediate operand is within a certain range. -Be careful when doing this, because the result of `INTVAL' is an -integer on the host machine. If the host machine has more bits in an -`int' than the target machine has in the mode in which the constant -will be used, then some of the bits you get from `INTVAL' will be -superfluous. For proper results, you must carefully disregard the -values of those bits. - - It is possible to output an assembler instruction and then go on to -output or compute more of them, using the subroutine `output_asm_insn'. - This receives two arguments: a template-string and a vector of -operands. The vector may be `operands', or it may be another array of -`rtx' that you declare locally and initialize yourself. - - When an insn pattern has multiple alternatives in its constraints, -often the appearance of the assembler code is determined mostly by -which alternative was matched. When this is so, the C code can test -the variable `which_alternative', which is the ordinal number of the -alternative that was actually satisfied (0 for the first, 1 for the -second alternative, etc.). - - For example, suppose there are two opcodes for storing zero, `clrreg' -for registers and `clrmem' for memory locations. Here is how a pattern -could use `which_alternative' to choose between them: - - (define_insn "" - [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "general_operand" "=r,m") - (const_int 0))] - "" - "* - return (which_alternative == 0 - ? \"clrreg %0\" : \"clrmem %0\"); - ") - - The example above, where the assembler code to generate was *solely* -determined by the alternative, could also have been specified as -follows, having the output control string start with a `@': - - (define_insn "" - [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "general_operand" "=r,m") - (const_int 0))] - "" - "@ - clrreg %0 - clrmem %0") +License," "Funding for Free Software," and "Protect Your Freedom--Fight +`Look And Feel'", and this permission notice, may be included in +translations approved by the Free Software Foundation instead of in the +original English. + + +File: gcc.info, Node: Bug Reporting, Next: Sending Patches, Prev: Bug Lists, Up: Bugs + +How to Report Bugs +================== + + The fundamental principle of reporting bugs usefully is this: +*report all the facts*. If you are not sure whether to state a fact or +leave it out, state it! + + Often people omit facts because they think they know what causes the +problem and they conclude that some details don't matter. Thus, you +might assume that the name of the variable you use in an example does +not matter. Well, probably it doesn't, but one cannot be sure. +Perhaps the bug is a stray memory reference which happens to fetch from +the location where that name is stored in memory; perhaps, if the name +were different, the contents of that location would fool the compiler +into doing the right thing despite the bug. Play it safe and give a +specific, complete example. That is the easiest thing for you to do, +and the most helpful. + + Keep in mind that the purpose of a bug report is to enable someone to +fix the bug if it is not known. It isn't very important what happens if +the bug is already known. Therefore, always write your bug reports on +the assumption that the bug is not known. + + Sometimes people give a few sketchy facts and ask, "Does this ring a +bell?" This cannot help us fix a bug, so it is basically useless. We +respond by asking for enough details to enable us to investigate. You +might as well expedite matters by sending them to begin with. + + Try to make your bug report self-contained. If we have to ask you +for more information, it is best if you include all the previous +information in your response, as well as the information that was +missing. + + Please report each bug in a separate message. This makes it easier +for us to track which bugs have been fixed and to forward your bugs +reports to the appropriate maintainer. + + To enable someone to investigate the bug, you should include all +these things: + + * The version of GNU CC. You can get this by running it with the + `-v' option. + + Without this, we won't know whether there is any point in looking + for the bug in the current version of GNU CC. + + * A complete input file that will reproduce the bug. If the bug is + in the C preprocessor, send a source file and any header files + that it requires. If the bug is in the compiler proper (`cc1'), + run your source file through the C preprocessor by doing `gcc -E + SOURCEFILE > OUTFILE', then include the contents of OUTFILE in the + bug report. (When you do this, use the same `-I', `-D' or `-U' + options that you used in actual compilation.) + + A single statement is not enough of an example. In order to + compile it, it must be embedded in a complete file of compiler + input; and the bug might depend on the details of how this is done. + + Without a real example one can compile, all anyone can do about + your bug report is wish you luck. It would be futile to try to + guess how to provoke the bug. For example, bugs in register + allocation and reloading frequently depend on every little detail + of the function they happen in. + + Even if the input file that fails comes from a GNU program, you + should still send the complete test case. Don't ask the GNU CC + maintainers to do the extra work of obtaining the program in + question--they are all overworked as it is. Also, the problem may + depend on what is in the header files on your system; it is + unreliable for the GNU CC maintainers to try the problem with the + header files available to them. By sending CPP output, you can + eliminate this source of uncertainty and save us a certain + percentage of wild goose chases. + + * The command arguments you gave GNU CC or GNU C++ to compile that + example and observe the bug. For example, did you use `-O'? To + guarantee you won't omit something important, list all the options. + + If we were to try to guess the arguments, we would probably guess + wrong and then we would not encounter the bug. + + * The type of machine you are using, and the operating system name + and version number. + + * The operands you gave to the `configure' command when you installed + the compiler. + + * A complete list of any modifications you have made to the compiler + source. (We don't promise to investigate the bug unless it + happens in an unmodified compiler. But if you've made + modifications and don't tell us, then you are sending us on a wild + goose chase.) + + Be precise about these changes. A description in English is not + enough--send a context diff for them. + + Adding files of your own (such as a machine description for a + machine we don't support) is a modification of the compiler source. + + * Details of any other deviations from the standard procedure for + installing GNU CC. + + * A description of what behavior you observe that you believe is + incorrect. For example, "The compiler gets a fatal signal," or, + "The assembler instruction at line 208 in the output is incorrect." + + Of course, if the bug is that the compiler gets a fatal signal, + then one can't miss it. But if the bug is incorrect output, the + maintainer might not notice unless it is glaringly wrong. None of + us has time to study all the assembler code from a 50-line C + program just on the chance that one instruction might be wrong. + We need *you* to do this part! + + Even if the problem you experience is a fatal signal, you should + still say so explicitly. Suppose something strange is going on, + such as, your copy of the compiler is out of synch, or you have + encountered a bug in the C library on your system. (This has + happened!) Your copy might crash and the copy here would not. If + you said to expect a crash, then when the compiler here fails to + crash, we would know that the bug was not happening. If you don't + say to expect a crash, then we would not know whether the bug was + happening. We would not be able to draw any conclusion from our + observations. + + If the problem is a diagnostic when compiling GNU CC with some + other compiler, say whether it is a warning or an error. + + Often the observed symptom is incorrect output when your program + is run. Sad to say, this is not enough information unless the + program is short and simple. None of us has time to study a large + program to figure out how it would work if compiled correctly, + much less which line of it was compiled wrong. So you will have + to do that. Tell us which source line it is, and what incorrect + result happens when that line is executed. A person who + understands the program can find this as easily as finding a bug + in the program itself. + + * If you send examples of assembler code output from GNU CC or GNU + C++, please use `-g' when you make them. The debugging information + includes source line numbers which are essential for correlating + the output with the input. + + * If you wish to mention something in the GNU CC source, refer to it + by context, not by line number. + + The line numbers in the development sources don't match those in + your sources. Your line numbers would convey no useful + information to the maintainers. + + * Additional information from a debugger might enable someone to + find a problem on a machine which he does not have available. + However, you need to think when you collect this information if + you want it to have any chance of being useful. + + For example, many people send just a backtrace, but that is never + useful by itself. A simple backtrace with arguments conveys little + about GNU CC because the compiler is largely data-driven; the same + functions are called over and over for different RTL insns, doing + different things depending on the details of the insn. + + Most of the arguments listed in the backtrace are useless because + they are pointers to RTL list structure. The numeric values of the + pointers, which the debugger prints in the backtrace, have no + significance whatever; all that matters is the contents of the + objects they point to (and most of the contents are other such + pointers). + + In addition, most compiler passes consist of one or more loops that + scan the RTL insn sequence. The most vital piece of information + about such a loop--which insn it has reached--is usually in a + local variable, not in an argument. + + What you need to provide in addition to a backtrace are the values + of the local variables for several stack frames up. When a local + variable or an argument is an RTX, first print its value and then + use the GDB command `pr' to print the RTL expression that it points + to. (If GDB doesn't run on your machine, use your debugger to call + the function `debug_rtx' with the RTX as an argument.) In + general, whenever a variable is a pointer, its value is no use + without the data it points to. + + Here are some things that are not necessary: + + * A description of the envelope of the bug. + + Often people who encounter a bug spend a lot of time investigating + which changes to the input file will make the bug go away and which + changes will not affect it. + + This is often time consuming and not very useful, because the way + we will find the bug is by running a single example under the + debugger with breakpoints, not by pure deduction from a series of + examples. You might as well save your time for something else. + + Of course, if you can find a simpler example to report *instead* of + the original one, that is a convenience. Errors in the output + will be easier to spot, running under the debugger will take less + time, etc. Most GNU CC bugs involve just one function, so the + most straightforward way to simplify an example is to delete all + the function definitions except the one where the bug occurs. + Those earlier in the file may be replaced by external declarations + if the crucial function depends on them. (Exception: inline + functions may affect compilation of functions defined later in the + file.) + + However, simplification is not vital; if you don't want to do this, + report the bug anyway and send the entire test case you used. + + * In particular, some people insert conditionals `#ifdef BUG' around + a statement which, if removed, makes the bug not happen. These + are just clutter; we won't pay any attention to them anyway. + Besides, you should send us cpp output, and that can't have + conditionals. + + * A patch for the bug. + + A patch for the bug is useful if it is a good one. But don't omit + the necessary information, such as the test case, on the + assumption that a patch is all we need. We might see problems + with your patch and decide to fix the problem another way, or we + might not understand it at all. + + Sometimes with a program as complicated as GNU CC it is very hard + to construct an example that will make the program follow a + certain path through the code. If you don't send the example, we + won't be able to construct one, so we won't be able to verify that + the bug is fixed. + + And if we can't understand what bug you are trying to fix, or why + your patch should be an improvement, we won't install it. A test + case will help us to understand. + + *Note Sending Patches::, for guidelines on how to make it easy for + us to understand and install your patches. + + * A guess about what the bug is or what it depends on. + + Such guesses are usually wrong. Even I can't guess right about + such things without first using the debugger to find the facts. + + * A core dump file. + + We have no way of examining a core dump for your type of machine + unless we have an identical system--and if we do have one, we + should be able to reproduce the crash ourselves. + + +File: gcc.info, Node: Sending Patches, Prev: Bug Reporting, Up: Bugs + +Sending Patches for GNU CC +========================== + + If you would like to write bug fixes or improvements for the GNU C +compiler, that is very helpful. When you send your changes, please +follow these guidelines to avoid causing extra work for us in studying +the patches. + + If you don't follow these guidelines, your information might still be +useful, but using it will take extra work. Maintaining GNU C is a lot +of work in the best of circumstances, and we can't keep up unless you do +your best to help. + + * Send an explanation with your changes of what problem they fix or + what improvement they bring about. For a bug fix, just include a + copy of the bug report, and explain why the change fixes the bug. + + (Referring to a bug report is not as good as including it, because + then we will have to look it up, and we have probably already + deleted it if we've already fixed the bug.) + + * Always include a proper bug report for the problem you think you + have fixed. We need to convince ourselves that the change is + right before installing it. Even if it is right, we might have + trouble judging it if we don't have a way to reproduce the problem. + + * Include all the comments that are appropriate to help people + reading the source in the future understand why this change was + needed. + + * Don't mix together changes made for different reasons. Send them + *individually*. + + If you make two changes for separate reasons, then we might not + want to install them both. We might want to install just one. If + you send them all jumbled together in a single set of diffs, we + have to do extra work to disentangle them--to figure out which + parts of the change serve which purpose. If we don't have time + for this, we might have to ignore your changes entirely. + + If you send each change as soon as you have written it, with its + own explanation, then the two changes never get tangled up, and we + can consider each one properly without any extra work to + disentangle them. + + Ideally, each change you send should be impossible to subdivide + into parts that we might want to consider separately, because each + of its parts gets its motivation from the other parts. + + * Send each change as soon as that change is finished. Sometimes + people think they are helping us by accumulating many changes to + send them all together. As explained above, this is absolutely + the worst thing you could do. + + Since you should send each change separately, you might as well + send it right away. That gives us the option of installing it + immediately if it is important. + + * Use `diff -c' to make your diffs. Diffs without context are hard + for us to install reliably. More than that, they make it hard for + us to study the diffs to decide whether we want to install them. + Unidiff format is better than contextless diffs, but not as easy + to read as `-c' format. + + If you have GNU diff, use `diff -cp', which shows the name of the + function that each change occurs in. + + * Write the change log entries for your changes. We get lots of + changes, and we don't have time to do all the change log writing + ourselves. + + Read the `ChangeLog' file to see what sorts of information to put + in, and to learn the style that we use. The purpose of the change + log is to show people where to find what was changed. So you need + to be specific about what functions you changed; in large + functions, it's often helpful to indicate where within the + function the change was. + + On the other hand, once you have shown people where to find the + change, you need not explain its purpose. Thus, if you add a new + function, all you need to say about it is that it is new. If you + feel that the purpose needs explaining, it probably does--but the + explanation will be much more useful if you put it in comments in + the code. + + If you would like your name to appear in the header line for who + made the change, send us the header line. + + * When you write the fix, keep in mind that we can't install a + change that would break other systems. + + People often suggest fixing a problem by changing + machine-independent files such as `toplev.c' to do something + special that a particular system needs. Sometimes it is totally + obvious that such changes would break GNU CC for almost all users. + We can't possibly make a change like that. At best it might tell + us how to write another patch that would solve the problem + acceptably. + + Sometimes people send fixes that *might* be an improvement in + general--but it is hard to be sure of this. It's hard to install + such changes because we have to study them very carefully. Of + course, a good explanation of the reasoning by which you concluded + the change was correct can help convince us. + + The safest changes are changes to the configuration files for a + particular machine. These are safe because they can't create new + bugs on other machines. + + Please help us keep up with the workload by designing the patch in + a form that is good to install. + + +File: gcc.info, Node: Service, Next: VMS, Prev: Bugs, Up: Top + +How To Get Help with GNU CC +*************************** + + If you need help installing, using or changing GNU CC, there are two +ways to find it: + + * Send a message to a suitable network mailing list. First try + `bug-gcc@prep.ai.mit.edu', and if that brings no response, try + `help-gcc@prep.ai.mit.edu'. + + * Look in the service directory for someone who might help you for a + fee. The service directory is found in the file named `SERVICE' + in the GNU CC distribution.  -File: gcc.info, Node: Constraints, Next: Standard Names, Prev: Output Statement, Up: Machine Desc +File: gcc.info, Node: VMS, Next: Portability, Prev: Service, Up: Top -Operand Constraints -=================== +Using GNU CC on VMS +******************* - Each `match_operand' in an instruction pattern can specify a -constraint for the type of operands allowed. Constraints can say -whether an operand may be in a register, and which kinds of register; -whether the operand can be a memory reference, and which kinds of -address; whether the operand may be an immediate constant, and which -possible values it may have. Constraints can also require two operands -to match. + Here is how to use GNU CC on VMS. * Menu: -* Simple Constraints:: Basic use of constraints. -* Multi-Alternative:: When an insn has two alternative constraint-patterns. -* Class Preferences:: Constraints guide which hard register to put things in. -* Modifiers:: More precise control over effects of constraints. -* No Constraints:: Describing a clean machine without constraints. - - -File: gcc.info, Node: Simple Constraints, Next: Multi-Alternative, Prev: Constraints, Up: Constraints - -Simple Constraints ------------------- - - The simplest kind of constraint is a string full of letters, each of -which describes one kind of operand that is permitted. Here are the -letters that are allowed: - -`m' - A memory operand is allowed, with any kind of address that the - machine supports in general. - -`o' - A memory operand is allowed, but only if the address is - "offsettable". This means that adding a small integer (actually, - the width in bytes of the operand, as determined by its machine - mode) may be added to the address and the result is also a valid - memory address. - - For example, an address which is constant is offsettable; so is an - address that is the sum of a register and a constant (as long as a - slightly larger constant is also within the range of - address-offsets supported by the machine); but an autoincrement or - autodecrement address is not offsettable. More complicated - indirect/indexed addresses may or may not be offsettable depending - on the other addressing modes that the machine supports. - - Note that in an output operand which can be matched by another - operand, the constraint letter `o' is valid only when accompanied - by both `<' (if the target machine has predecrement addressing) - and `>' (if the target machine has preincrement addressing). - -`V' - A memory operand that is not offsettable. In other words, - anything that would fit the `m' constraint but not the `o' - constraint. - -`<' - A memory operand with autodecrement addressing (either - predecrement or postdecrement) is allowed. - -`>' - A memory operand with autoincrement addressing (either - preincrement or postincrement) is allowed. - -`r' - A register operand is allowed provided that it is in a general - register. - -`d', `a', `f', ... - Other letters can be defined in machine-dependent fashion to stand - for particular classes of registers. `d', `a' and `f' are defined - on the 68000/68020 to stand for data, address and floating point - registers. - -`i' - An immediate integer operand (one with constant value) is allowed. - This includes symbolic constants whose values will be known only at - assembly time. - -`n' - An immediate integer operand with a known numeric value is allowed. - Many systems cannot support assembly-time constants for operands - less than a word wide. Constraints for these operands should use - `n' rather than `i'. - -`I', `J', `K', ... `P' - Other letters in the range `I' through `P' may be defined in a - machine-dependent fashion to permit immediate integer operands with - explicit integer values in specified ranges. For example, on the - 68000, `I' is defined to stand for the range of values 1 to 8. - This is the range permitted as a shift count in the shift - instructions. - -`E' - An immediate floating operand (expression code `const_double') is - allowed, but only if the target floating point format is the same - as that of the host machine (on which the compiler is running). - -`F' - An immediate floating operand (expression code `const_double') is - allowed. - -`G', `H' - `G' and `H' may be defined in a machine-dependent fashion to - permit immediate floating operands in particular ranges of values. - -`s' - An immediate integer operand whose value is not an explicit - integer is allowed. - - This might appear strange; if an insn allows a constant operand - with a value not known at compile time, it certainly must allow - any known value. So why use `s' instead of `i'? Sometimes it - allows better code to be generated. - - For example, on the 68000 in a fullword instruction it is possible - to use an immediate operand; but if the immediate value is between - -128 and 127, better code results from loading the value into a - register and using the register. This is because the load into - the register can be done with a `moveq' instruction. We arrange - for this to happen by defining the letter `K' to mean "any integer - outside the range -128 to 127", and then specifying `Ks' in the - operand constraints. - -`g' - Any register, memory or immediate integer operand is allowed, - except for registers that are not general registers. - -`X' - Any operand whatsoever is allowed, even if it does not satisfy - `general_operand'. This is normally used in the constraint of a - `match_scratch' when certain alternatives will not actually - require a scratch register. - -`0', `1', `2', ... `9' - An operand that matches the specified operand number is allowed. - If a digit is used together with letters within the same - alternative, the digit should come last. - - This is called a "matching constraint" and what it really means is - that the assembler has only a single operand that fills two roles - considered separate in the RTL insn. For example, an add insn has - two input operands and one output operand in the RTL, but on most - CISC machines an add instruction really has only two operands, one - of them an input-output operand: - - addl #35,r12 - - Matching constraints are used in these circumstances. More - precisely, the two operands that match must include one input-only - operand and one output-only operand. Moreover, the digit must be a - smaller number than the number of the operand that uses it in the - constraint. - - For operands to match in a particular case usually means that they - are identical-looking RTL expressions. But in a few special cases - specific kinds of dissimilarity are allowed. For example, `*x' as - an input operand will match `*x++' as an output operand. For - proper results in such cases, the output template should always - use the output-operand's number when printing the operand. - -`p' - An operand that is a valid memory address is allowed. This is for - "load address" and "push address" instructions. - - `p' in the constraint must be accompanied by `address_operand' as - the predicate in the `match_operand'. This predicate interprets - the mode specified in the `match_operand' as the mode of the memory - reference for which the address would be valid. - -`Q', `R', `S', ... `U' - Letters in the range `Q' through `U' may be defined in a - machine-dependent fashion to stand for arbitrary operand types. - The machine description macro `EXTRA_CONSTRAINT' is passed the - operand as its first argument and the constraint letter as its - second operand. - - A typical use for this would be to distinguish certain types of - memory references that affect other insn operands. - - Do not define these constraint letters to accept register - references (`reg'); the reload pass does not expect this and would - not handle it properly. - - In order to have valid assembler code, each operand must satisfy its -constraint. But a failure to do so does not prevent the pattern from -applying to an insn. Instead, it directs the compiler to modify the -code so that the constraint will be satisfied. Usually this is done by -copying an operand into a register. - - Contrast, therefore, the two instruction patterns that follow: - - (define_insn "" - [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "general_operand" "=r") - (plus:SI (match_dup 0) - (match_operand:SI 1 "general_operand" "r")))] - "" - "...") - -which has two operands, one of which must appear in two places, and - - (define_insn "" - [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "general_operand" "=r") - (plus:SI (match_operand:SI 1 "general_operand" "0") - (match_operand:SI 2 "general_operand" "r")))] - "" - "...") - -which has three operands, two of which are required by a constraint to -be identical. If we are considering an insn of the form - - (insn N PREV NEXT - (set (reg:SI 3) - (plus:SI (reg:SI 6) (reg:SI 109))) - ...) - -the first pattern would not apply at all, because this insn does not -contain two identical subexpressions in the right place. The pattern -would say, "That does not look like an add instruction; try other -patterns." The second pattern would say, "Yes, that's an add -instruction, but there is something wrong with it." It would direct -the reload pass of the compiler to generate additional insns to make -the constraint true. The results might look like this: - - (insn N2 PREV N - (set (reg:SI 3) (reg:SI 6)) - ...) - - (insn N N2 NEXT - (set (reg:SI 3) - (plus:SI (reg:SI 3) (reg:SI 109))) - ...) - - It is up to you to make sure that each operand, in each pattern, has -constraints that can handle any RTL expression that could be present for -that operand. (When multiple alternatives are in use, each pattern -must, for each possible combination of operand expressions, have at -least one alternative which can handle that combination of operands.) -The constraints don't need to *allow* any possible operand--when this is -the case, they do not constrain--but they must at least point the way to -reloading any possible operand so that it will fit. - - * If the constraint accepts whatever operands the predicate permits, - there is no problem: reloading is never necessary for this operand. - - For example, an operand whose constraints permit everything except - registers is safe provided its predicate rejects registers. - - An operand whose predicate accepts only constant values is safe - provided its constraints include the letter `i'. If any possible - constant value is accepted, then nothing less than `i' will do; if - the predicate is more selective, then the constraints may also be - more selective. - - * Any operand expression can be reloaded by copying it into a - register. So if an operand's constraints allow some kind of - register, it is certain to be safe. It need not permit all - classes of registers; the compiler knows how to copy a register - into another register of the proper class in order to make an - instruction valid. - - * A nonoffsettable memory reference can be reloaded by copying the - address into a register. So if the constraint uses the letter - `o', all memory references are taken care of. - - * A constant operand can be reloaded by allocating space in memory to - hold it as preinitialized data. Then the memory reference can be - used in place of the constant. So if the constraint uses the - letters `o' or `m', constant operands are not a problem. - - * If the constraint permits a constant and a pseudo register used in - an insn was not allocated to a hard register and is equivalent to - a constant, the register will be replaced with the constant. If - the predicate does not permit a constant and the insn is - re-recognized for some reason, the compiler will crash. Thus the - predicate must always recognize any objects allowed by the - constraint. - - If the operand's predicate can recognize registers, but the -constraint does not permit them, it can make the compiler crash. When -this operand happens to be a register, the reload pass will be stymied, -because it does not know how to copy a register temporarily into memory. - - -File: gcc.info, Node: Multi-Alternative, Next: Class Preferences, Prev: Simple Constraints, Up: Constraints - -Multiple Alternative Constraints --------------------------------- - - Sometimes a single instruction has multiple alternative sets of -possible operands. For example, on the 68000, a logical-or instruction -can combine register or an immediate value into memory, or it can -combine any kind of operand into a register; but it cannot combine one -memory location into another. - - These constraints are represented as multiple alternatives. An -alternative can be described by a series of letters for each operand. -The overall constraint for an operand is made from the letters for this -operand from the first alternative, a comma, the letters for this -operand from the second alternative, a comma, and so on until the last -alternative. Here is how it is done for fullword logical-or on the -68000: - - (define_insn "iorsi3" - [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "general_operand" "=m,d") - (ior:SI (match_operand:SI 1 "general_operand" "%0,0") - (match_operand:SI 2 "general_operand" "dKs,dmKs")))] - ...) - - The first alternative has `m' (memory) for operand 0, `0' for -operand 1 (meaning it must match operand 0), and `dKs' for operand 2. -The second alternative has `d' (data register) for operand 0, `0' for -operand 1, and `dmKs' for operand 2. The `=' and `%' in the -constraints apply to all the alternatives; their meaning is explained -in the next section (*note Class Preferences::.). - - If all the operands fit any one alternative, the instruction is -valid. Otherwise, for each alternative, the compiler counts how many -instructions must be added to copy the operands so that that -alternative applies. The alternative requiring the least copying is -chosen. If two alternatives need the same amount of copying, the one -that comes first is chosen. These choices can be altered with the `?' -and `!' characters: - -`?' - Disparage slightly the alternative that the `?' appears in, as a - choice when no alternative applies exactly. The compiler regards - this alternative as one unit more costly for each `?' that appears - in it. - -`!' - Disparage severely the alternative that the `!' appears in. This - alternative can still be used if it fits without reloading, but if - reloading is needed, some other alternative will be used. - - When an insn pattern has multiple alternatives in its constraints, -often the appearance of the assembler code is determined mostly by which -alternative was matched. When this is so, the C code for writing the -assembler code can use the variable `which_alternative', which is the -ordinal number of the alternative that was actually satisfied (0 for -the first, 1 for the second alternative, etc.). *Note Output -Statement::. - - -File: gcc.info, Node: Class Preferences, Next: Modifiers, Prev: Multi-Alternative, Up: Constraints - -Register Class Preferences --------------------------- - - The operand constraints have another function: they enable the -compiler to decide which kind of hardware register a pseudo register is -best allocated to. The compiler examines the constraints that apply to -the insns that use the pseudo register, looking for the -machine-dependent letters such as `d' and `a' that specify classes of -registers. The pseudo register is put in whichever class gets the most -"votes". The constraint letters `g' and `r' also vote: they vote in -favor of a general register. The machine description says which -registers are considered general. - - Of course, on some machines all registers are equivalent, and no -register classes are defined. Then none of this complexity is relevant. - - -File: gcc.info, Node: Modifiers, Next: No Constraints, Prev: Class Preferences, Up: Constraints - -Constraint Modifier Characters ------------------------------- - -`=' - Means that this operand is write-only for this instruction: the - previous value is discarded and replaced by output data. - -`+' - Means that this operand is both read and written by the - instruction. - - When the compiler fixes up the operands to satisfy the constraints, - it needs to know which operands are inputs to the instruction and - which are outputs from it. `=' identifies an output; `+' - identifies an operand that is both input and output; all other - operands are assumed to be input only. - -`&' - Means (in a particular alternative) that this operand is written - before the instruction is finished using the input operands. - Therefore, this operand may not lie in a register that is used as - an input operand or as part of any memory address. - - `&' applies only to the alternative in which it is written. In - constraints with multiple alternatives, sometimes one alternative - requires `&' while others do not. See, for example, the `movdf' - insn of the 68000. - - `&' does not obviate the need to write `='. - -`%' - Declares the instruction to be commutative for this operand and the - following operand. This means that the compiler may interchange - the two operands if that is the cheapest way to make all operands - fit the constraints. This is often used in patterns for addition - instructions that really have only two operands: the result must - go in one of the arguments. Here for example, is how the 68000 - halfword-add instruction is defined: - - (define_insn "addhi3" - [(set (match_operand:HI 0 "general_operand" "=m,r") - (plus:HI (match_operand:HI 1 "general_operand" "%0,0") - (match_operand:HI 2 "general_operand" "di,g")))] - ...) - -`#' - Says that all following characters, up to the next comma, are to be - ignored as a constraint. They are significant only for choosing - register preferences. - -`*' - Says that the following character should be ignored when choosing - register preferences. `*' has no effect on the meaning of the - constraint as a constraint, and no effect on reloading. - - Here is an example: the 68000 has an instruction to sign-extend a - halfword in a data register, and can also sign-extend a value by - copying it into an address register. While either kind of - register is acceptable, the constraints on an address-register - destination are less strict, so it is best if register allocation - makes an address register its goal. Therefore, `*' is used so - that the `d' constraint letter (for data register) is ignored when - computing register preferences. - - (define_insn "extendhisi2" - [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "general_operand" "=*d,a") - (sign_extend:SI - (match_operand:HI 1 "general_operand" "0,g")))] - ...) - - -File: gcc.info, Node: No Constraints, Prev: Modifiers, Up: Constraints - -Not Using Constraints ---------------------- - - Some machines are so clean that operand constraints are not -required. For example, on the Vax, an operand valid in one context is -valid in any other context. On such a machine, every operand -constraint would be `g', excepting only operands of "load address" -instructions which are written as if they referred to a memory -location's contents but actual refer to its address. They would have -constraint `p'. - - For such machines, instead of writing `g' and `p' for all the -constraints, you can choose to write a description with empty -constraints. Then you write `""' for the constraint in every -`match_operand'. Address operands are identified by writing an -`address' expression around the `match_operand', not by their -constraints. - - When the machine description has just empty constraints, certain -parts of compilation are skipped, making the compiler faster. However, -few machines actually do not need constraints; all machine descriptions -now in existence use constraints. +* Include Files and VMS:: Where the preprocessor looks for the include files. +* Global Declarations:: How to do globaldef, globalref and globalvalue with + GNU CC. +* VMS Misc:: Misc information. + + +File: gcc.info, Node: Include Files and VMS, Next: Global Declarations, Up: VMS + +Include Files and VMS +===================== + + Due to the differences between the filesystems of Unix and VMS, GNU +CC attempts to translate file names in `#include' into names that VMS +will understand. The basic strategy is to prepend a prefix to the +specification of the include file, convert the whole filename to a VMS +filename, and then try to open the file. GNU CC tries various prefixes +one by one until one of them succeeds: + + 1. The first prefix is the `GNU_CC_INCLUDE:' logical name: this is + where GNU C header files are traditionally stored. If you wish to + store header files in non-standard locations, then you can assign + the logical `GNU_CC_INCLUDE' to be a search list, where each + element of the list is suitable for use with a rooted logical. + + 2. The next prefix tried is `SYS$SYSROOT:[SYSLIB.]'. This is where + VAX-C header files are traditionally stored. + + 3. If the include file specification by itself is a valid VMS + filename, the preprocessor then uses this name with no prefix in + an attempt to open the include file. + + 4. If the file specification is not a valid VMS filename (i.e. does + not contain a device or a directory specifier, and contains a `/' + character), the preprocessor tries to convert it from Unix syntax + to VMS syntax. + + Conversion works like this: the first directory name becomes a + device, and the rest of the directories are converted into + VMS-format directory names. For example, the name `X11/foobar.h' + is translated to `X11:[000000]foobar.h' or `X11:foobar.h', + whichever one can be opened. This strategy allows you to assign a + logical name to point to the actual location of the header files. + + 5. If none of these strategies succeeds, the `#include' fails. + + Include directives of the form: + + #include foobar + +are a common source of incompatibility between VAX-C and GNU CC. VAX-C +treats this much like a standard `#include ' directive. That +is incompatible with the ANSI C behavior implemented by GNU CC: to +expand the name `foobar' as a macro. Macro expansion should eventually +yield one of the two standard formats for `#include': + + #include "FILE" + #include + + If you have this problem, the best solution is to modify the source +to convert the `#include' directives to one of the two standard forms. +That will work with either compiler. If you want a quick and dirty fix, +define the file names as macros with the proper expansion, like this: + + #define stdio + +This will work, as long as the name doesn't conflict with anything else +in the program. + + Another source of incompatibility is that VAX-C assumes that: + + #include "foobar" + +is actually asking for the file `foobar.h'. GNU CC does not make this +assumption, and instead takes what you ask for literally; it tries to +read the file `foobar'. The best way to avoid this problem is to +always specify the desired file extension in your include directives. + + GNU CC for VMS is distributed with a set of include files that is +sufficient to compile most general purpose programs. Even though the +GNU CC distribution does not contain header files to define constants +and structures for some VMS system-specific functions, there is no +reason why you cannot use GNU CC with any of these functions. You first +may have to generate or create header files, either by using the public +domain utility `UNSDL' (which can be found on a DECUS tape), or by +extracting the relevant modules from one of the system macro libraries, +and using an editor to construct a C header file. + + A `#include' file name cannot contain a DECNET node name. The +preprocessor reports an I/O error if you attempt to use a node name, +whether explicitly, or implicitly via a logical name. + + +File: gcc.info, Node: Global Declarations, Next: VMS Misc, Prev: Include Files and VMS, Up: VMS + +Global Declarations and VMS +=========================== + + GNU CC does not provide the `globalref', `globaldef' and +`globalvalue' keywords of VAX-C. You can get the same effect with an +obscure feature of GAS, the GNU assembler. (This requires GAS version +1.39 or later.) The following macros allow you to use this feature in +a fairly natural way: + + #ifdef __GNUC__ + #define GLOBALREF(TYPE,NAME) \ + TYPE NAME \ + asm ("_$$PsectAttributes_GLOBALSYMBOL$$" #NAME) + #define GLOBALDEF(TYPE,NAME,VALUE) \ + TYPE NAME \ + asm ("_$$PsectAttributes_GLOBALSYMBOL$$" #NAME) \ + = VALUE + #define GLOBALVALUEREF(TYPE,NAME) \ + const TYPE NAME[1] \ + asm ("_$$PsectAttributes_GLOBALVALUE$$" #NAME) + #define GLOBALVALUEDEF(TYPE,NAME,VALUE) \ + const TYPE NAME[1] \ + asm ("_$$PsectAttributes_GLOBALVALUE$$" #NAME) \ + = {VALUE} + #else + #define GLOBALREF(TYPE,NAME) \ + globalref TYPE NAME + #define GLOBALDEF(TYPE,NAME,VALUE) \ + globaldef TYPE NAME = VALUE + #define GLOBALVALUEDEF(TYPE,NAME,VALUE) \ + globalvalue TYPE NAME = VALUE + #define GLOBALVALUEREF(TYPE,NAME) \ + globalvalue TYPE NAME + #endif + +(The `_$$PsectAttributes_GLOBALSYMBOL' prefix at the start of the name +is removed by the assembler, after it has modified the attributes of +the symbol). These macros are provided in the VMS binaries +distribution in a header file `GNU_HACKS.H'. An example of the usage +is: + + GLOBALREF (int, ijk); + GLOBALDEF (int, jkl, 0); + + The macros `GLOBALREF' and `GLOBALDEF' cannot be used +straightforwardly for arrays, since there is no way to insert the array +dimension into the declaration at the right place. However, you can +declare an array with these macros if you first define a typedef for the +array type, like this: + + typedef int intvector[10]; + GLOBALREF (intvector, foo); + + Array and structure initializers will also break the macros; you can +define the initializer to be a macro of its own, or you can expand the +`GLOBALDEF' macro by hand. You may find a case where you wish to use +the `GLOBALDEF' macro with a large array, but you are not interested in +explicitly initializing each element of the array. In such cases you +can use an initializer like: `{0,}', which will initialize the entire +array to `0'. + + A shortcoming of this implementation is that a variable declared with +`GLOBALVALUEREF' or `GLOBALVALUEDEF' is always an array. For example, +the declaration: + + GLOBALVALUEREF(int, ijk); + +declares the variable `ijk' as an array of type `int [1]'. This is +done because a globalvalue is actually a constant; its "value" is what +the linker would normally consider an address. That is not how an +integer value works in C, but it is how an array works. So treating +the symbol as an array name gives consistent results--with the +exception that the value seems to have the wrong type. *Don't try to +access an element of the array.* It doesn't have any elements. The +array "address" may not be the address of actual storage. + + The fact that the symbol is an array may lead to warnings where the +variable is used. Insert type casts to avoid the warnings. Here is an +example; it takes advantage of the ANSI C feature allowing macros that +expand to use the same name as the macro itself. + + GLOBALVALUEREF (int, ss$_normal); + GLOBALVALUEDEF (int, xyzzy,123); + #ifdef __GNUC__ + #define ss$_normal ((int) ss$_normal) + #define xyzzy ((int) xyzzy) + #endif + + Don't use `globaldef' or `globalref' with a variable whose type is +an enumeration type; this is not implemented. Instead, make the +variable an integer, and use a `globalvaluedef' for each of the +enumeration values. An example of this would be: + + #ifdef __GNUC__ + GLOBALDEF (int, color, 0); + GLOBALVALUEDEF (int, RED, 0); + GLOBALVALUEDEF (int, BLUE, 1); + GLOBALVALUEDEF (int, GREEN, 3); + #else + enum globaldef color {RED, BLUE, GREEN = 3}; + #endif + + +File: gcc.info, Node: VMS Misc, Prev: Global Declarations, Up: VMS + +Other VMS Issues +================ + + GNU CC automatically arranges for `main' to return 1 by default if +you fail to specify an explicit return value. This will be interpreted +by VMS as a status code indicating a normal successful completion. +Version 1 of GNU CC did not provide this default. + + GNU CC on VMS works only with the GNU assembler, GAS. You need +version 1.37 or later of GAS in order to produce value debugging +information for the VMS debugger. Use the ordinary VMS linker with the +object files produced by GAS. + + Under previous versions of GNU CC, the generated code would +occasionally give strange results when linked to the sharable `VAXCRTL' +library. Now this should work. + + A caveat for use of `const' global variables: the `const' modifier +must be specified in every external declaration of the variable in all +of the source files that use that variable. Otherwise the linker will +issue warnings about conflicting attributes for the variable. Your +program will still work despite the warnings, but the variable will be +placed in writable storage. + + Although the VMS linker does distinguish between upper and lower case +letters in global symbols, most VMS compilers convert all such symbols +into upper case and most run-time library routines also have upper case +names. To be able to reliably call such routines, GNU CC (by means of +the assembler GAS) converts global symbols into upper case like other +VMS compilers. However, since the usual practice in C is to distinguish +case, GNU CC (via GAS) tries to preserve usual C behavior by augmenting +each name that is not all lower case. This means truncating the name +to at most 23 characters and then adding more characters at the end +which encode the case pattern of those 23. Names which contain at +least one dollar sign are an exception; they are converted directly into +upper case without augmentation. + + Name augmentation yields bad results for programs that use +precompiled libraries (such as Xlib) which were generated by another +compiler. You can use the compiler option `/NOCASE_HACK' to inhibit +augmentation; it makes external C functions and variables +case-independent as is usual on VMS. Alternatively, you could write +all references to the functions and variables in such libraries using +lower case; this will work on VMS, but is not portable to other +systems. The compiler option `/NAMES' also provides control over +global name handling. + + Function and variable names are handled somewhat differently with GNU +C++. The GNU C++ compiler performs "name mangling" on function names, +which means that it adds information to the function name to describe +the data types of the arguments that the function takes. One result of +this is that the name of a function can become very long. Since the +VMS linker only recognizes the first 31 characters in a name, special +action is taken to ensure that each function and variable has a unique +name that can be represented in 31 characters. + + If the name (plus a name augmentation, if required) is less than 32 +characters in length, then no special action is performed. If the name +is longer than 31 characters, the assembler (GAS) will generate a hash +string based upon the function name, truncate the function name to 23 +characters, and append the hash string to the truncated name. If the +`/VERBOSE' compiler option is used, the assembler will print both the +full and truncated names of each symbol that is truncated. + + The `/NOCASE_HACK' compiler option should not be used when you are +compiling programs that use libg++. libg++ has several instances of +objects (i.e. `Filebuf' and `filebuf') which become indistinguishable +in a case-insensitive environment. This leads to cases where you need +to inhibit augmentation selectively (if you were using libg++ and Xlib +in the same program, for example). There is no special feature for +doing this, but you can get the result by defining a macro for each +mixed case symbol for which you wish to inhibit augmentation. The +macro should expand into the lower case equivalent of itself. For +example: + + #define StuDlyCapS studlycaps + + These macro definitions can be placed in a header file to minimize +the number of changes to your source code. + + +File: gcc.info, Node: Portability, Next: Interface, Prev: VMS, Up: Top + +GNU CC and Portability +********************** + + The main goal of GNU CC was to make a good, fast compiler for +machines in the class that the GNU system aims to run on: 32-bit +machines that address 8-bit bytes and have several general registers. +Elegance, theoretical power and simplicity are only secondary. + + GNU CC gets most of the information about the target machine from a +machine description which gives an algebraic formula for each of the +machine's instructions. This is a very clean way to describe the +target. But when the compiler needs information that is difficult to +express in this fashion, I have not hesitated to define an ad-hoc +parameter to the machine description. The purpose of portability is to +reduce the total work needed on the compiler; it was not of interest +for its own sake. + + GNU CC does not contain machine dependent code, but it does contain +code that depends on machine parameters such as endianness (whether the +most significant byte has the highest or lowest address of the bytes in +a word) and the availability of autoincrement addressing. In the +RTL-generation pass, it is often necessary to have multiple strategies +for generating code for a particular kind of syntax tree, strategies +that are usable for different combinations of parameters. Often I have +not tried to address all possible cases, but only the common ones or +only the ones that I have encountered. As a result, a new target may +require additional strategies. You will know if this happens because +the compiler will call `abort'. Fortunately, the new strategies can be +added in a machine-independent fashion, and will affect only the target +machines that need them. + + +File: gcc.info, Node: Interface, Next: Passes, Prev: Portability, Up: Top + +Interfacing to GNU CC Output +**************************** + + GNU CC is normally configured to use the same function calling +convention normally in use on the target system. This is done with the +machine-description macros described (*note Target Macros::.). + + However, returning of structure and union values is done differently +on some target machines. As a result, functions compiled with PCC +returning such types cannot be called from code compiled with GNU CC, +and vice versa. This does not cause trouble often because few Unix +library routines return structures or unions. + + GNU CC code returns structures and unions that are 1, 2, 4 or 8 bytes +long in the same registers used for `int' or `double' return values. +(GNU CC typically allocates variables of such types in registers also.) +Structures and unions of other sizes are returned by storing them into +an address passed by the caller (usually in a register). The +machine-description macros `STRUCT_VALUE' and `STRUCT_INCOMING_VALUE' +tell GNU CC where to pass this address. + + By contrast, PCC on most target machines returns structures and +unions of any size by copying the data into an area of static storage, +and then returning the address of that storage as if it were a pointer +value. The caller must copy the data from that memory area to the +place where the value is wanted. This is slower than the method used +by GNU CC, and fails to be reentrant. + + On some target machines, such as RISC machines and the 80386, the +standard system convention is to pass to the subroutine the address of +where to return the value. On these machines, GNU CC has been +configured to be compatible with the standard compiler, when this method +is used. It may not be compatible for structures of 1, 2, 4 or 8 bytes. + + GNU CC uses the system's standard convention for passing arguments. +On some machines, the first few arguments are passed in registers; in +others, all are passed on the stack. It would be possible to use +registers for argument passing on any machine, and this would probably +result in a significant speedup. But the result would be complete +incompatibility with code that follows the standard convention. So this +change is practical only if you are switching to GNU CC as the sole C +compiler for the system. We may implement register argument passing on +certain machines once we have a complete GNU system so that we can +compile the libraries with GNU CC. + + On some machines (particularly the Sparc), certain types of arguments +are passed "by invisible reference". This means that the value is +stored in memory, and the address of the memory location is passed to +the subroutine. + + If you use `longjmp', beware of automatic variables. ANSI C says +that automatic variables that are not declared `volatile' have undefined +values after a `longjmp'. And this is all GNU CC promises to do, +because it is very difficult to restore register variables correctly, +and one of GNU CC's features is that it can put variables in registers +without your asking it to. + + If you want a variable to be unaltered by `longjmp', and you don't +want to write `volatile' because old C compilers don't accept it, just +take the address of the variable. If a variable's address is ever +taken, even if just to compute it and ignore it, then the variable +cannot go in a register: + + { + int careful; + &careful; + ... + } + + Code compiled with GNU CC may call certain library routines. Most of +them handle arithmetic for which there are no instructions. This +includes multiply and divide on some machines, and floating point +operations on any machine for which floating point support is disabled +with `-msoft-float'. Some standard parts of the C library, such as +`bcopy' or `memcpy', are also called automatically. The usual function +call interface is used for calling the library routines. + + These library routines should be defined in the library `libgcc.a', +which GNU CC automatically searches whenever it links a program. On +machines that have multiply and divide instructions, if hardware +floating point is in use, normally `libgcc.a' is not needed, but it is +searched just in case. + + Each arithmetic function is defined in `libgcc1.c' to use the +corresponding C arithmetic operator. As long as the file is compiled +with another C compiler, which supports all the C arithmetic operators, +this file will work portably. However, `libgcc1.c' does not work if +compiled with GNU CC, because each arithmetic function would compile +into a call to itself! - \ No newline at end of file