|
|
Microsoft Windows NT Build 297 06-28-1992
Sample: Using Named Mutexes Between Independent Processes Summary: MUTEX demonstrates using a named mutex between independent processes. More Information: A mutex is often more appropriate to use between processes than a semaphore. A potential drawback to the semaphore is that any thread, even a thread not having control of the semaphore, can call the ReleaseSemaphore function and change it's use count. Another drawback is that if a thread gains control of a semaphore, modifying the semaphore's use count denies access to the semaphore by other threads or processes; if that thread dies before calling ReleaseSemaphore and changing the use count back, no other thread or process will be able to gain access to the semaphore. On the other hand, when a thread having control of a mutex dies, the use count on the mutex is automatically modified to allow other threads and processes access to it. To Use: Start any number of instances of this application. Each instance will start a thread which will request access to the mutex. when the thread has the mutex, it will print a message in the application window "I HAVE CONTROL OF THE MUTEX!", and then sleep for two seconds. It will then wake up, erase the message, release the mutex; and then sleep for another two seconds before asking for control again. By starting several instances, you will see that each instance will often have to wait longer than it's two seconds before it gets control.
This archive runs on limited infrastructure. Preserving old code on modern bandwidth. Automated agents are requested to crawl responsibly.