![[BACK]](/cvsweb/icons/back.gif){kind=icon}
Return to mbox CVS log ![[TXT]](/cvsweb/icons/text.gif){kind=icon}
![[DIR]](/cvsweb/icons/dir.gif){kind=icon}
Up to [Research Unix] / researchv10dc / vol2 / ADM|
Return to mbox CVS log | Up to [Research Unix] / researchv10dc / vol2 / ADM |
1.1 ! root 1: From sfgum!condry Tue May 23 12:06 EDT 1989 ! 2: Would you mail a draft copy for the 10th edition ! 3: to me: ! 4: Michael COndry ! 5: SF G-226 ! 6: attunix!condry ! 7: ! 8: Thanks ! 9: ! 10: From andrew ! 11: after a chat with doug, i propose the following ! 12: to deal with how to deal with the past publication of ! 13: papers in vol2; both within the paper and within references. ! 14: ! 15: within the paper: ! 16: if there has been substantial work by a new author, ! 17: the paper gets that person as a new author. ! 18: there will be a footnote on the first page referring ! 19: to the last published version of the paper AND a comment ! 20: on who and how much revision was done. For example, ! 21: my editing of the lex paper would be 'reformatted by ANdrew Hume' ! 22: whereas the mk paper was significantly tweaked and thus ! 23: 'revised' and if more work was done, 'substantially revised'. ! 24: ! 25: references: ! 26: references to papers within vol2 have the vol2 paper as the primary ! 27: reference and an 'also in' pointer to the last published version. ! 28: ! 29: let me know if you are happy or not with this. ! 30: ! 31: From utzoo!utgpu!godzilla.eecg.toronto.edu!drb Thu Jul 20 23:50:03 1989 ! 32: Received: from godzilla.eecg.toronto.edu by gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca with SMTP id 5285; Thu, 20 Jul 89 23:49:49 EDT ! 33: Received: by godzilla.eecg.toronto.edu id 2409; Thu, 20 Jul 89 23:49:14 EDT ! 34: From: "David R. Blythe" <[email protected]> ! 35: To: research!andrew@utzoo ! 36: Subject: reviewers ! 37: Message-Id: <[email protected]> ! 38: Date: Thu, 20 Jul 89 23:48:59 EDT ! 39: ! 40: I would be happy to review it if you are allowing 2-3 weeks ! 41: for the review period. ! 42: David Blythe ! 43: ! 44: ! 45: From yquem!ber Thu Jul 20 18:41 EDT 1989 ! 46: To: research!andrew ! 47: ! 48: I'm game. When can you get it to me. Before I leave for ! 49: a week 8/6 would be good, then I could read it while on vacation. ! 50: ! 51: ber ! 52: ! 53: From arpa!geoff Thu Jul 20 18:28:02 EDT 1989 ! 54: From: [email protected] ! 55: Date: Thu, 20 Jul 89 18:28:02 EDT ! 56: To: [email protected] ! 57: ! 58: I'll read papers for the new edition. I have already ! 59: read the upas paper. How soon do you need comments? ! 60: ! 61: From pipe!andrew Fri Jul 21 08:37:45 EDT 1989 ! 62: proposed action for vol 2: ! 63: ! 64: by approx aug 1, volume 2 will be more or less complete. ! 65: the only papers likely to be missing that i care about are the ! 66: UCDS paper and norman's config paper. accordingly, i will make ! 67: a couple of review copies to go to some reviewers (say like ! 68: redman) and get back feedback on selection/presentation/content. ! 69: ! 70: by sept 1, i hope to have the above two missing papers ! 71: and have folded back in feedback from the aug 1 review. This ! 72: set i will send out for review by more people. ! 73: ! 74: around oct 1, finish reviewing, do any editing and ! 75: last minute updates and be ready for publishing. ! 76: ! 77: ! 78: comments? ! 79: ! 80: From honey Fri Jul 21 10:58:51 1989 ! 81: From: Peter Honeyman <[email protected]> ! 82: To: [email protected] ! 83: Date: 21 Jul 1989 10:57 EDT ! 84: ! 85: i volunteer my services as well as those of my droids. ! 86: ! 87: From acsnet!oz!su!cs!sarad!bob Fri Jul 21 05:44:17 1989 ! 88: To: [email protected] ! 89: In-reply-to: Your message of 21 Jul 1989 17:03 (Friday). ! 90: ! 91: Piers and I would be happy to review the new manual. Piers will be ! 92: dropping in to you next week so you can tell him he was volunteered! ! 93: ! 94: From utzoo!henry Fri Jul 21 15:15:57 1989 ! 95: To: research!andrew ! 96: Subject: manual ! 97: ! 98: > we are producing a new edition of the manual, ! 99: > both volumes 1 and 2. we are looking for a couple of ! 100: > volunteers outside the center to review both volumes. ! 101: ! 102: Definitely interested enough to review it, although if this is scheduled ! 103: to happen next week I can't make it :-) -- I'll be away until Aug 2. ! 104: ! 105: Henry Spencer at U of Toronto Zoology ! 106: uunet!attcan!utzoo!henry [email protected] ! 107: ! 108: ! 109: From arpa!csri.toronto.edu!darwin Fri Jul 28 10:34:53 EDT 1989 ! 110: Received: from darwin by lowther.csri.toronto.edu via UNIX id AA02305; Fri, 28 Jul 89 10:34:53 EDT ! 111: Date: Fri, 28 Jul 89 10:34:53 EDT ! 112: From: "Ian F. Darwin" <[email protected]> ! 113: Message-Id: <[email protected]> ! 114: To: [email protected] ! 115: Subject: new manual ! 116: Cc: [email protected] ! 117: ! 118: I'd be willing to read volume 1 and some parts of vol2, tho I can't ! 119: promise to get all the way thru 2 (unless you are very patient). ! 120: Are you shipping the drafts in troff form or on paper? ! 121: ! 122: Thanks ! 123: Ian Darwin ! 124: [email protected] (among other places) ! 125: ! 126: From arpa!mtxinu.COM!ed Wed Aug 2 09:53:28 0700 1989 ! 127: Received: by garcia.mtxinu.COM (5.61/1.29-emg890307) ! 128: id AA00521; Wed, 2 Aug 89 09:53:28 -0700 ! 129: Date: Wed, 2 Aug 89 09:53:28 -0700 ! 130: From: [email protected] (Ed Gould) ! 131: Message-Id: <[email protected]> ! 132: To: [email protected] ! 133: Subject: 10th Edition ! 134: ! 135: Send it to me: ! 136: ! 137: Ed Gould ! 138: mt Xinu ! 139: 2560 Ninth Street ! 140: Berkeley, CA 94710 ! 141: ! 142: What's in the various volumes? What kind of review do you want? ! 143: ! 144: Ed ! 145: ! 146: From utzoo!henry Tue Aug 29 17:59:14 1989 ! 147: To: research!andrew ! 148: Subject: V10 manual ! 149: Cc: utstat!geoff ! 150: ! 151: Having read most of the manual earlier in the month, I find I'm now pushed ! 152: for time when it comes to making a second pass for critical comments, so ! 153: this is going to be a bit sparser than I like... ! 154: ! 155: Something I've kept forgetting to grump about is that page 23 of the Sam ! 156: paper and page 4 of the picture-format paper were blank in the copy I ! 157: got. (The latter I don't mind; the former was right in the middle of ! 158: the most interesting part! :-)) ! 159: ! 160: Is the Spin stuff really of sufficiently wide applicability to be in the ! 161: manual? Maybe I'm just not into protocol design the way your crew is... ! 162: Or was it included at least partly for the Promela manual? If so, the ! 163: blurb in the table of contents should mention that. ! 164: ! 165: Dennis's paper on streams is certainly worth including, but it would sure ! 166: be nice if there were a companion paper with up-to-date details on the ! 167: programming nitty-gritty of writing a stream module. Even the V8 kernel ! 168: had a lot of fine points in the source that weren't written up anywhere, ! 169: and I imagine it's gotten worse. ! 170: ! 171: I'm surprised to find a writeup on the Blit communications protocols but ! 172: none on writing Blit programs. Surely the latter are far more numerous, ! 173: and far more likely subjects for new programmers' creativity, than from- ! 174: scratch reimplementations of the former? And from what I know of it, ! 175: the in-Blit environment is different enough to need documenting. ! 176: ! 177: Nobody's using "bc" any more? ! 178: ! 179: The Monk paper is good on "how to type documents", but I miss seeing a ! 180: reference manual and/or innards manual for Monk. ! 181: ! 182: ! 183: From arpa!geoff Fri Sep 1 02:53:19 EDT 1989 ! 184: From: [email protected] ! 185: Date: Fri, 1 Sep 89 02:53:19 EDT ! 186: To: research!andrew ! 187: Cc: utzoo!henry ! 188: ! 189: Here are my comments on the draft V10 manual. I'm sorry that they are ! 190: arriving at the last moment; Henry only gave me the manual Tuesday ! 191: evening. These comments are a mix of stylistic, spelling and content ! 192: remarks. ! 193: ! 194: First a few general comments. I would like to see ! 195: previously-unpublished papers and papers that will never be published ! 196: in the open literature included in volume 2. Your attempt to use a ! 197: two-column format has largely succeeded, but an uncomfortable number of ! 198: displays crowd the second column, and the vertical space between ! 199: paragraphs and displays is often jarringly large in the first column. ! 200: I have noted below pages with large vertical spaces. In a few places, ! 201: noted below, I noticed an assumption that laser printers all understand ! 202: PostScript; I was surprised by the unusually low level of discussion ! 203: and wonder whether this assumption is rooted in local circumstances, ! 204: wishful thinking or PostScript enthusiasm. ! 205: ! 206: Table of Contents. It misspells obsolete as `obselete'. I'll second ! 207: Henry's comment on the lack of a bc manual, though perhaps you expect ! 208: people to see the V7 volume 2 for that. If so, why not omit the dc ! 209: manual too? Reference 28 looks incomplete. The tours of pdp-11 cc and ! 210: pcc have vanished; how about restoring the tour of pcc and adding tours ! 211: of cfront, cyntax and cemantics? If the latter three tours exist, I ! 212: don't believe they have been published, which makes them all the more ! 213: valuable. The tour of the i/o system by dmr vanished; is there a ! 214: current replacement? It too has not been published in the open ! 215: literature. I miss the old "UNIX Summary", brought up to date. I see ! 216: that UNIX Programming is gone. I know that it is reprinted wholesale ! 217: in The UNIX Programming Environment, but I think people are more likely ! 218: to read volume 2 than any book on UNIX and there is invaluable advice ! 219: in there, such as how to catch signals correctly, that far too many ! 220: people get wrong, out of ignorance. I see nothing on the V9 shell nor ! 221: m4. m4 is arguably covered by m4(1) but your shell is different enough ! 222: that I wonder if sh(1) really covers it. Should there be something on ! 223: Datakit? You should probably cite the "New S" book, not the "old S" ! 224: book. ! 225: ! 226: -ms. The abstract says "the the UNIX\(rg" Are the old macros, such as ! 227: .TL, .AB, .AE and .AU, still recognised? There is a disagreement about ! 228: spelling: "in Palatino you would say ! 229: .FP palitano". The detailed discussion of lp and PostScript is jarring ! 230: and seems inappropriate to me. ! 231: ! 232: eqn. Isn't saying "AT&T death-star \(bs" considered insubordination? ! 233: ! 234: tbl. The table in section 7 is incomplete; at least u/U and z/Z are ! 235: missing. ! 236: ! 237: dag. That's an interesting UNIX family tree(!) but it lacks "10th ! 238: edition". Is figure 4 a joke about "subrecursive hierarchies of ! 239: functions" theory? ! 240: ! 241: prefer. Throughout, inter-paragraph distance is large and jarring. ! 242: ! 243: cip. My cip does allow different sizes and fonts of text. The paper ! 244: refers to the 68000 in the blit. ! 245: ! 246: ped. The first column of p. 4 is really spacey. ! 247: ! 248: troff. It's up to date, and looks better in general (one could always ! 249: see what had been hard to typeset in the old one) but non-tabular ! 250: request descriptions aren't quite as pleasant as the old tabular ones. ! 251: In section 20, the .mc description is indented too much. p. 34 col. 1 ! 252: is spacey! ! 253: ! 254: troff tutorial. p. 2 col 1. is spacey. On p. 3 change "many laser ! 255: writers" to "many laser printers"? p. 7 sees two first column examples ! 256: run into the second column, luckily only into whitespace. p. 14 is ! 257: really badly spacey; can't this be fixed? In appendix A, the eqn paper ! 258: and the troff tutorial think death-star is spelled \(L1, but troff ! 259: thinks it's spelled \(bs. Who's right? Does appendix A belong in this ! 260: document at all, especially since it disagrees with p.36 of the troff ! 261: manual? In appendix B, "Laserwiter" is missing an "r". ! 262: ! 263: monk. On p. 3, the letter at the bottom of the second column runs on ! 264: to the next page. In section 4.11, equation (1a) on p. 9 is utterly ! 265: empty and on p.10, eqn didn't process the in-line equation at the end ! 266: of the section. Shouldn't 4.13 be set in constant-width? On p.11, ! 267: section 4.14 figure 3 crashes into section 4.15! Also fig. 3 hasn't ! 268: been through pic and in section 4.14, figure 4 hasn't been through pic ! 269: nor eqn. ! 270: ! 271: mk. p. 6 column 1 is spacey again. Ozan mentioned that you are about ! 272: to change the world; true? before or after the V10 manual? Change ! 273: "aboyt" to "about". ! 274: ! 275: snocone. p. 12 is very spacey. Are people still using Snobol? ! 276: ! 277: f77. p.1 is very spacey. Is f89/f9? coming? Why is there no ratfor ! 278: paper? No one writes bare Fortran. Again, you should probably include ! 279: or omit both papers. ! 280: ! 281: pi case study. Both pi papers are great. In section 3, \\n appears ! 282: twice in the sample program; change to \n. ! 283: ! 284: dc. p.1 column 1 is very spacey. You probably should include or omit ! 285: both dc and bc papers. Why is pic referrence 2? Does pic use dc now? ! 286: ! 287: yacc. The characters are fuzzy and the whole appearance is unique; is ! 288: this tex output? ! 289: ! 290: lex. Pages 7, 10 and 12 have spacey first columns. ! 291: ! 292: sam. A great paper. p.22 column 1 is spacey. ! 293: ! 294: spin. The mix of 2 column text and wide examples is disruptive and ! 295: confusing. ! 296: ! 297: picture format. In p.3 section 3, troff has rendered the "fi" ligature ! 298: in "picfile.h" (which is CW) as a Roman ligature! ! 299: ! 300: setting up. On p.2 change `# umask 2"' to `# umask 2'. ! 301: ! 302: blit protocols. p.1 column 1 is spacey. It would be nice to have 5620 ! 303: protocols documented too. ! 304: ! 305: v9 netb. Change "ontaining" to "containing". Pages 8-10 first columns ! 306: are all very spacey! ! 307: ! 308: v9 ipc. On p. 6, change "wait a connection" to "wait for a connection". ! 309: ! 310: unix security. Change "anuary 16" to "January 16". ! 311: ! 312: upas. I have already commented to ches. ! 313: ! 314: uucp by honey, dan and ber. On p.7, example "READ=/usr/ber/..." runs ! 315: off the page. On p.8, both LOGNAME examples crash into the 2nd column; ! 316: the 2nd one is missing a "\" at the end of the first line. On p.12, ! 317: the second example plows into the second column. The first 3 ! 318: appendices have headings on the pages preceding the starts of their ! 319: contents (i.e. move each heading to the next page). Appendix III has ! 320: ``'' which should be "". ! 321: ! 322: backups. Change UIMPS to UMIPS. p.8 is a mess of overprinting. ! 323: ! 324: From arpa!mtxinu.COM!ed Mon Sep 18 11:07:59 0700 1989 ! 325: Received: by garcia.mtxinu.COM (5.61/1.29-emg890307) ! 326: id AA01019; Mon, 18 Sep 89 11:07:59 -0700 ! 327: Date: Mon, 18 Sep 89 11:07:59 -0700 ! 328: From: [email protected] (Ed Gould) ! 329: Message-Id: <[email protected]> ! 330: To: [email protected] ! 331: Subject: Tenth Edition, Volume 2 ! 332: ! 333: Well, I finally have something for you. I hope it's not too late ! 334: to use. (I'll be sending the marked-up copy to you via Fed Ex ! 335: today as well.) ! 336: ! 337: These are general comments about style. I agree that a two-column ! 338: format is generally easier to read, but for many of the papers ! 339: the price seems to be too high. In particular, many of the examples ! 340: (unfilled text) extend beyone the edge of the column; in some ! 341: cases (the Honey-DAN-BER UUCP paper comes to mind) the example ! 342: disappears off the right edge of the page or obliterates text in ! 343: the right-hand column. Vertical justification of the columns often ! 344: produces unpleasing amounts of space between paragraphs. It's ! 345: particularly bad in Koenig's "Snocone" paper. I seem to remember ! 346: seeing an orphaned section title, too. (That struck me as a bug ! 347: in the vertical-spacing stuff, not as a fundamental problem.) ! 348: ! 349: A few of the titles seemed uncharacteristically uninformative. ! 350: Titles of the form "FooBar, a Language for Fools -- User's Manual" ! 351: are better than "FooBar Manual". The Spin and Pico papers ! 352: were the ones that particularly struck me. ! 353: ! 354: Font usage is not uniform. For example, the "sam" paper uses ! 355: the CW font for the name of the program - even in the title - ! 356: where others use Italic. I think I saw one paper that used CW ! 357: for section titles (but I didn't write down which one, and I dont see it ! 358: now in a quick look); the Sethi YACC paper is typographically unique ! 359: (actually, I like much of it; I'm not, however, fond of mixing ! 360: sans-serif titles with serifed text). ! 361: ! 362: Odds and ends are marked in red on the hard copy. I tried to make ! 363: them obvious enough to find by just glancing at the marked page, ! 364: but I didn't do anything to flag the marked pages. ! 365: ! 366: Let me know *today* if the following is not the correct address ! 367: to which to send the hard copy: ! 368: ! 369: Andrew Hume ! 370: Bell Laboratories ! 371: Room 2C-471 ! 372: 600 Mountain Ave. ! 373: Murray Hill, NJ 07974 ! 374: ! 375: Ed ! 376: ! 377: From arpa!mtxinu.COM!ed Thu Sep 21 11:24:16 0700 1989 ! 378: Received: by garcia.mtxinu.COM (5.61/1.29-emg890307) ! 379: id AA00878; Thu, 21 Sep 89 11:24:16 -0700 ! 380: Date: Thu, 21 Sep 89 11:24:16 -0700 ! 381: From: [email protected] (Ed Gould) ! 382: Message-Id: <[email protected]> ! 383: To: [email protected] ! 384: ! 385: I was the only reviewer here, but I'd love to get one for myself ! 386: as well as one for the company. ! 387: ! 388: From norman Sat Sep 23 12:36:00 EDT 1989 ! 389: Hayes,Donald L bl 614860 4289 CB 1L334 45256 cbusa!dlh ! 390: ! 391: From arpa!geoff Fri Sep 1 02:53:19 EDT 1989 ! 392: From: [email protected] ! 393: Date: Fri, 1 Sep 89 02:53:19 EDT ! 394: To: research!andrew ! 395: Cc: utzoo!henry ! 396: ! 397: Here are my comments on the draft V10 manual. I'm sorry that they are ! 398: arriving at the last moment; Henry only gave me the manual Tuesday ! 399: evening. These comments are a mix of stylistic, spelling and content ! 400: remarks. ! 401: ! 402: First a few general comments. I would like to see ! 403: previously-unpublished papers and papers that will never be published ! 404: in the open literature included in volume 2. Your attempt to use a ! 405: two-column format has largely succeeded, but an uncomfortable number of ! 406: displays crowd the second column, and the vertical space between ! 407: paragraphs and displays is often jarringly large in the first column. ! 408: I have noted below pages with large vertical spaces. In a few places, ! 409: noted below, I noticed an assumption that laser printers all understand ! 410: PostScript; I was surprised by the unusually low level of discussion ! 411: and wonder whether this assumption is rooted in local circumstances, ! 412: wishful thinking or PostScript enthusiasm. ! 413: ! 414: Table of Contents. It misspells obsolete as `obselete'. I'll second ! 415: Henry's comment on the lack of a bc manual, though perhaps you expect ! 416: people to see the V7 volume 2 for that. If so, why not omit the dc ! 417: manual too? Reference 28 looks incomplete. The tours of pdp-11 cc and ! 418: pcc have vanished; how about restoring the tour of pcc and adding tours ! 419: of cfront, cyntax and cemantics? If the latter three tours exist, I ! 420: don't believe they have been published, which makes them all the more ! 421: valuable. The tour of the i/o system by dmr vanished; is there a ! 422: current replacement? It too has not been published in the open ! 423: literature. I miss the old "UNIX Summary", brought up to date. I see ! 424: that UNIX Programming is gone. I know that it is reprinted wholesale ! 425: in The UNIX Programming Environment, but I think people are more likely ! 426: to read volume 2 than any book on UNIX and there is invaluable advice ! 427: in there, such as how to catch signals correctly, that far too many ! 428: people get wrong, out of ignorance. I see nothing on the V9 shell nor ! 429: m4. m4 is arguably covered by m4(1) but your shell is different enough ! 430: that I wonder if sh(1) really covers it. Should there be something on ! 431: Datakit? You should probably cite the "New S" book, not the "old S" ! 432: book. ! 433: ! 434: -ms. The abstract says "the the UNIX\(rg" Are the old macros, such as ! 435: .TL, .AB, .AE and .AU, still recognised? There is a disagreement about ! 436: spelling: "in Palatino you would say ! 437: .FP palitano". The detailed discussion of lp and PostScript is jarring ! 438: and seems inappropriate to me. ! 439: ! 440: eqn. Isn't saying "AT&T death-star \(bs" considered insubordination? ! 441: ! 442: tbl. The table in section 7 is incomplete; at least u/U and z/Z are ! 443: missing. ! 444: ! 445: dag. That's an interesting UNIX family tree(!) but it lacks "10th ! 446: edition". Is figure 4 a joke about "subrecursive hierarchies of ! 447: functions" theory? ! 448: ! 449: prefer. Throughout, inter-paragraph distance is large and jarring. ! 450: ! 451: cip. My cip does allow different sizes and fonts of text. The paper ! 452: refers to the 68000 in the blit. ! 453: ! 454: ped. The first column of p. 4 is really spacey. ! 455: ! 456: troff. It's up to date, and looks better in general (one could always ! 457: see what had been hard to typeset in the old one) but non-tabular ! 458: request descriptions aren't quite as pleasant as the old tabular ones. ! 459: In section 20, the .mc description is indented too much. p. 34 col. 1 ! 460: is spacey! ! 461: ! 462: troff tutorial. p. 2 col 1. is spacey. On p. 3 change "many laser ! 463: writers" to "many laser printers"? p. 7 sees two first column examples ! 464: run into the second column, luckily only into whitespace. p. 14 is ! 465: really badly spacey; can't this be fixed? In appendix A, the eqn paper ! 466: and the troff tutorial think death-star is spelled \(L1, but troff ! 467: thinks it's spelled \(bs. Who's right? Does appendix A belong in this ! 468: document at all, especially since it disagrees with p.36 of the troff ! 469: manual? In appendix B, "Laserwiter" is missing an "r". ! 470: ! 471: monk. On p. 3, the letter at the bottom of the second column runs on ! 472: to the next page. In section 4.11, equation (1a) on p. 9 is utterly ! 473: empty and on p.10, eqn didn't process the in-line equation at the end ! 474: of the section. Shouldn't 4.13 be set in constant-width? On p.11, ! 475: section 4.14 figure 3 crashes into section 4.15! Also fig. 3 hasn't ! 476: been through pic and in section 4.14, figure 4 hasn't been through pic ! 477: nor eqn. ! 478: ! 479: mk. p. 6 column 1 is spacey again. Ozan mentioned that you are about ! 480: to change the world; true? before or after the V10 manual? Change ! 481: "aboyt" to "about". ! 482: ! 483: snocone. p. 12 is very spacey. Are people still using Snobol? ! 484: ! 485: f77. p.1 is very spacey. Is f89/f9? coming? Why is there no ratfor ! 486: paper? No one writes bare Fortran. Again, you should probably include ! 487: or omit both papers. ! 488: ! 489: pi case study. Both pi papers are great. In section 3, \\n appears ! 490: twice in the sample program; change to \n. ! 491: ! 492: dc. p.1 column 1 is very spacey. You probably should include or omit ! 493: both dc and bc papers. Why is pic referrence 2? Does pic use dc now? ! 494: ! 495: yacc. The characters are fuzzy and the whole appearance is unique; is ! 496: this tex output? ! 497: ! 498: lex. Pages 7, 10 and 12 have spacey first columns. ! 499: ! 500: sam. A great paper. p.22 column 1 is spacey. ! 501: ! 502: spin. The mix of 2 column text and wide examples is disruptive and ! 503: confusing. ! 504: ! 505: picture format. In p.3 section 3, troff has rendered the "fi" ligature ! 506: in "picfile.h" (which is CW) as a Roman ligature! ! 507: ! 508: setting up. On p.2 change `# umask 2"' to `# umask 2'. ! 509: ! 510: blit protocols. p.1 column 1 is spacey. It would be nice to have 5620 ! 511: protocols documented too. ! 512: ! 513: v9 netb. Change "ontaining" to "containing". Pages 8-10 first columns ! 514: are all very spacey! ! 515: ! 516: v9 ipc. On p. 6, change "wait a connection" to "wait for a connection". ! 517: ! 518: unix security. Change "anuary 16" to "January 16". ! 519: ! 520: upas. I have already commented to ches. ! 521: ! 522: uucp by honey, dan and ber. On p.7, example "READ=/usr/ber/..." runs ! 523: off the page. On p.8, both LOGNAME examples crash into the 2nd column; ! 524: the 2nd one is missing a "\" at the end of the first line. On p.12, ! 525: the second example plows into the second column. The first 3 ! 526: appendices have headings on the pages preceding the starts of their ! 527: contents (i.e. move each heading to the next page). Appendix III has ! 528: ``'' which should be "". ! 529: ! 530: backups. Change UIMPS to UMIPS. p.8 is a mess of overprinting. ! 531:
This archive runs on limited infrastructure. Preserving old code on modern bandwidth. Automated agents are requested to crawl responsibly.