|
|
1.1 ! root 1: From: [email protected] ! 2: Newsgroups: general ! 3: Subject: Emily Post for Usenet ! 4: Date: Fri, 24-Dec-82 15:35:03 EST ! 5: Expires: 1-Jan-1985 ! 6: ! 7: Emily Post for Usenet ! 8: ! 9: Usenet is a large, amorphous collection of machines (hundreds) and ! 10: people (thousands). Readers range from casual observers who ! 11: infrequently scan one or two groups to active participants who spend a ! 12: significant amount of time each day reading news. Their ages, ! 13: experience and interests also vary widely. Some use the network ! 14: solely for professional purposes. Others use it to carry on a variety ! 15: of exchanges and interactions. ! 16: ! 17: The kinds of interaction that occur in Usenet are new to almost ! 18: everyone. The interactions certainly aren't face to face. On the ! 19: other hand, submitting an item isn't like standing up before an ! 20: audience either. Nor is it like writing an article for publication. ! 21: Nor, since no one moderates submissions, is it like writing a "letter ! 22: to the editor." It combines aspects of formal and informal ! 23: communications in a new way. ! 24: ! 25: Despite (or because of) these considerations Usenet is a powerful and ! 26: pleasant tool when people submitting items follow the emerging "net ! 27: etiquette." Users at new sites (those at which Usenet has been ! 28: available for less than three months) should be especially cautious ! 29: until they have adjusted to this new form of communication. ! 30: ! 31: This document is not a readnews tutorial. In some cases I tell you to ! 32: do something without saying how. Ask around or consult whatever ! 33: documentation is available. ! 34: ! 35: The following list of suggestions is long, but you can become a ! 36: responsible member of the Usenet community by reading it. Before ! 37: presenting a full discussion I will boldly state the rules: ! 38: ! 39: Put all items in an appropriate group. ! 40: Reply via mail. ! 41: Exhibit care in preparing items. ! 42: Read followups. ! 43: Don't be rude or abusive. ! 44: Avoid sarcasm and facetious remarks. ! 45: Use descriptive titles. ! 46: Cite references when appropriate. ! 47: Summarize the original item in followups. ! 48: In posting summaries of replies, summarize. ! 49: Be as brief as possible. ! 50: Don't submit items berating violators of these rules. ! 51: Don't make people read the same thing more than once. ! 52: Mark puzzles. ! 53: ! 54: A more extended discussion of these points, of some important ! 55: newsgroups, and of some common questions follows. ! 56: ! 57: 1. Put all items in an appropriate group. ! 58: ! 59: See below for a list of some important groups. A followup to an ! 60: item does not always belong in the same group as the original ! 61: item. In particular, followups should never go to net.general. ! 62: ! 63: Groups exist both to accommodate different interests and to ! 64: limit distribution. Many geographic areas and organizations ! 65: have groups that are only distributed locally. For example, on ! 66: eagle where I am composing this item there are "net" groups, ! 67: "btl" groups (Bell Labs), "mh" (Murray Hill) and "nj" groups ! 68: (New Jersey)" ! 69: ! 70: 2. Use mail instead of a followup item. ! 71: ! 72: When an item asks for specific information or requests a "vote", ! 73: you should reply via mail to the originator. Remember that many ! 74: people will be reading the item at more or less the same time ! 75: and if they all respond via a followup item, the net becomes ! 76: flooded with almost identical responses that can annoy even ! 77: people who were interested in the original question. ! 78: ! 79: When submitting an item that is likely to generate responses, ! 80: remind people of this point by ending with "send me mail and ! 81: I'll post the results to the net." Of course, you then accept ! 82: the obligation of doing so. ! 83: ! 84: 3. Exhibit care in preparing items. ! 85: ! 86: While Usenet interactions sometimes take on the flavor of casual ! 87: conversation, you should spend the time and effort to make your ! 88: item readable and pertinent. Be sure you have something new to ! 89: say. In particular, be sure you have understood earlier items. ! 90: If you are in doubt about an author's intent, carry on a private ! 91: interaction. Frequently a discussion starts with one or two ! 92: carefully prepared "position papers" and then degenerates into ! 93: repetitive claims. ! 94: ! 95: While proper spelling and grammar do not necessarily improve the ! 96: ideas of an item, many readers feel that a lack of attention to ! 97: English usage may reflect a similar lack of attention to the ! 98: ideas. ! 99: ! 100: 4. Read followups before reacting. ! 101: ! 102: When you read an item, followups may have already reached your ! 103: machine. Before reacting to the item (either with mail or by ! 104: submitting a followup) you ought to know what others have said. ! 105: ! 106: The standard readnews interface doesn't make this easy, but it ! 107: should be done. (See below.) ! 108: ! 109: 5. Use an editor to prepare items for submission. ! 110: ! 111: If you are using the standard version of readnews or postnews ! 112: you should set the EDITOR shell environment variable to the ! 113: editor you want to use. This lets you correct spelling, ! 114: grammar, etc. ! 115: ! 116: 6. Don't be rude or abusive. ! 117: ! 118: I regret having to say this, but I have seen too many items that ! 119: start "John, you idiot, ...", or contain phrases like "People ! 120: who think ... should be shot." I suspect much of this rudeness ! 121: is just carelessness. Modes of speech that would be reasonable ! 122: in private conversation may not be reasonable in a semi-public ! 123: forum such as the net. ! 124: ! 125: 7. Avoid sarcasm and facetious remarks. ! 126: ! 127: Without the voice inflection and body language of personal ! 128: communication these are easily misinterpreted. ! 129: ! 130: 8. Use descriptive titles. ! 131: ! 132: Readers should be able to decide whether to read or skip items ! 133: based on their titles. For example if you are having trouble ! 134: with your dishwasher you might submit an item titled "need help ! 135: with G.E. dishwasher" to net.wanted. Don't submit an item ! 136: titled "Need Help." ! 137: ! 138: Followups should be titled "Re:" followed by the title of the ! 139: original item. This is done automatically by the "f" command in ! 140: standard readnews. ! 141: ! 142: 9. Cite references when appropriate. ! 143: ! 144: This is especially true in discussions when you quote "facts" ! 145: that are not universally known. Many such "facts" turn out on ! 146: close examination to be opinions. This rule doesn't apply to ! 147: some groups like net.wanted or net.jokes where references are ! 148: irrelevant. ! 149: ! 150: 10. Summarize the original item in followups. ! 151: ! 152: Remember that although you may have an item in front of you when ! 153: you submit a followup, others won't. Remind the reader of the ! 154: point of the original item. But don't repeat a long item. That ! 155: would violate the "be brief" principle. ! 156: ! 157: 11. In posting summaries of replies, actually summarize. ! 158: ! 159: Sometimes people just collect the items they received. The ! 160: mailed replies might just as well been submitted to the net. At ! 161: the least the replies should be edited to eliminate redundancy ! 162: and irrelevancy. ! 163: ! 164: 12. Be as brief as possible. ! 165: ! 166: Some people read news over slow (300bps) terminals, and watching ! 167: a 15 line "signature" that you have seen ten times before gets ! 168: boring. (I hope you don't consider this item a violation. I ! 169: have tried to keep it brief, but there is a lot to say.) Even ! 170: people who read news on faster terminals don't like to wade ! 171: through extraneous material to get to the heart of the matter. ! 172: ! 173: 13. Don't publicly berate violaters of these rules. ! 174: ! 175: They probably didn't realize the anti-social nature of their ! 176: behavior. Besides, if you didn't want to see the original item ! 177: nobody wants to see your complaint. These complaints fall into ! 178: the category of reactions that should go directly to the ! 179: originator via mail. ! 180: ! 181: 14. Don't make people read the same thing more than once. ! 182: ! 183: When you have something to say that is of interest to more than ! 184: one group, submit it as one item to the groups with one command. ! 185: If you use a separate command for each group, readers who ! 186: subscribe to several of these groups will see it more than once. ! 187: ! 188: If you must retract or revise an item, use the "cancel" command ! 189: on the original. ! 190: ! 191: If your item provkes negative followups, don't submit more items ! 192: unless you have something new to say. There isn't much point in ! 193: submitting an item which just repeats your original submission. ! 194: ! 195: 15. Mark puzzles. ! 196: ! 197: Puzzles (questions to which you know the answer) are appropriate ! 198: in certain groups (e.g. net.math). When submitting a puzzle ! 199: make it clear that you know the answer and are submitting the ! 200: item for the amusement of others. This will prevent people from ! 201: putting the solution into followups. It will also let people who ! 202: know the solution (most submitted puzzles are old) ignore the ! 203: item without feeling guilty about not "helping" you. ! 204: ! 205: 16. Here is a list of some groups that are important to the smooth ! 206: functioning of the network or are frequently used improperly: ! 207: ! 208: - net.general ! 209: ! 210: This group is only for short announcements and queries that ! 211: need to be read by everyone. Followups and discussions ! 212: should never go here. ! 213: ! 214: - net.followup ! 215: ! 216: This is the place for continuing discussions that have ! 217: started in net.general. In the standard readnews program ! 218: the "f" command applied to an item in net.general will put ! 219: your submission in net.followup, but you can also submit ! 220: items directly to net.followup. ! 221: ! 222: - net.misc ! 223: ! 224: This is the place to carry on frivolous discussions, ! 225: arbitrary chat, and rambling discussions. New groups are ! 226: frequently spawned from these discussions. ! 227: ! 228: - net.wanted ! 229: ! 230: This group exists for posting queries for help. ("I know ! 231: somebody must have a program to compute ...") ! 232: ! 233: - net.jokes ! 234: ! 235: Jokes go here. Jokes that might offend any readers should ! 236: be encrypted. You can learn an encryption technique by ! 237: decoding some encrypted jokes. ! 238: ! 239: This group is often seen by people who do not regularly use ! 240: computers, and there have been several instances of ! 241: problems raised by offensive jokes. There have also been ! 242: several extended discussions of the relation of this issue ! 243: to free speech. The conclusion of these discussions has ! 244: always been that because the net exists largely at the ! 245: sufferance of large institutions who foot the bills we ! 246: should all be very careful about offending anyone. Almost ! 247: any racial, ethnic, or sexual reference will offend ! 248: somebody. The safe rule is: don't submit an unencrypted ! 249: joke unless you have seen similar ones in this group ! 250: already. ! 251: ! 252: - net.jokes.d ! 253: ! 254: Discussions about humor go here, not in net.jokes ! 255: ! 256: - net.news ! 257: ! 258: Discussion of all aspects of Usenet itself belong here. ! 259: ! 260: - net.news.group ! 261: ! 262: Creating a new group affects all the machines on Usenet. ! 263: Normally the need for a new group should be demonstrated by ! 264: the submission, over a period of time, of items that might ! 265: properly belong in a new group. If you are new to Usenet ! 266: (less than 3 months) you probably shouldn't be creating new ! 267: groups. ! 268: ! 269: If you want to discuss a topic and can't find anywhere ! 270: else, try net.misc. ! 271: ! 272: In any case before you create a new group, submit an item ! 273: proposing the new group to net.news.group and to specific ! 274: groups that may share interests with your proposed new ! 275: group. If after a week or two, you have received support ! 276: for the idea, and you haven't received any strenuous ! 277: objections, go ahead and create the group. You should also ! 278: create an item in the new group with a distant expiration ! 279: date describing what the group is about. ! 280: ! 281: - net.sources ! 282: ! 283: After being announced in some appropriate place useful ! 284: programs and shell scripts are put here. These should be ! 285: well enough commented so that even people who miss the ! 286: announcement can understand what they do. ! 287: ! 288: - net.test ! 289: ! 290: This exists so that Usenet administrators can test the ! 291: functioning of the software. It should be used only as a ! 292: last resort since items will go to all machines. In most ! 293: instances there will be a more limited group in which to ! 294: put tests (e.g. "mh.test"). ! 295: ! 296: 17. Here are some queries that seem to be submitted frequently by ! 297: new users. Please don't ask them out of idle curiosity. ! 298: ! 299: - "Where does 'fubar' come from?" ! 300: ! 301: In my opinion the best answer seems to be "Fouled up beyond ! 302: all relief." There are lots of versions of this acronym, in ! 303: particular "Fouled" is usually replaced by a less polite ! 304: word. "foobar", "foo" and "bar" are all derived from ! 305: "fubar." (See discussion of net.jokes for the reason I do ! 306: not use the less polite word.) ! 307: ! 308: - "What does 'rc' in files like '.newsrc' stand for?" ! 309: ! 310: It stands for "run command" and has become a convention for ! 311: any file containing initialization information for a ! 312: command. ! 313: ! 314: - "Does anybody know my freshman roommate, John Doe, who I ! 315: haven't seen in years but I think works at Bell Labs?" ! 316: ! 317: If you really want to know, try calling any Bell Labs ! 318: location and asking the operator. (The Murray Hill number ! 319: is 201-582-3000.) They have lists and telephone numbers of ! 320: all employees. The same of course applies to DEC or UCB or ! 321: wherever. ! 322: ! 323: - "I can't reply via mail to some items. What can I do?" ! 324: ! 325: There are two common causes for this. One is items from ! 326: ARPANET sites. (These have "@" in their names.) There are ! 327: technical, administrative and organizational problems with ! 328: communication between Usenet and ARPANET. The other cause ! 329: is machines that are on Usenet but won't forward mail. ! 330: (This includes some ARPANET sites and some uucp-only ! 331: sites.) The only (admittedly difficult) way to circumvent ! 332: both problems is to construct a path that avoids the ! 333: trouble machines. ! 334: ! 335: - "Is being called a 'hacker' a compliment or an insult?" ! 336: ! 337: Some people think one, some think the other. If you want ! 338: to be unambiguous find another word. ! 339: ! 340: - "How do I read followups to an item before I reply?" ! 341: ! 342: This depends on how you read news. If you use the standard ! 343: readnews program then the easiest way is to use the "e-" ! 344: command after reading an item. This will tell readnews to ! 345: forget that you have read the previous item. When you have ! 346: read the followups you can "q" and start readnews again. ! 347: ! 348: Phew!! Don't let this long list intimidate you. The net exists to be ! 349: used. It is a powerful tool and as long as people treat it as a tool ! 350: rather than a toy, it will prosper. ! 351: ! 352: Jerry Schwarz ! 353: eagle!jerry ! 354: ! 355: ! 356:
This archive runs on limited infrastructure. Preserving old code on modern bandwidth. Automated agents are requested to crawl responsibly.