|
|
1.1 ! root 1: From npois!npoiv!harpo!decvax!teklabs!tektronix!tekid!rogerw Wed Dec 15 00:06:41 1982 ! 2: Date: Mon Dec 13 09:55:44 1982 ! 3: From: npois!npoiv!harpo!decvax!teklabs!tektronix!tekid!rogerw ! 4: Subject: Re: Massive copyright violations on the net ! 5: Via: cbosgd.UUCP (V3.94 [3/6/82]); 15-Dec-82 00:06:40-EST (Wed) ! 6: To: tektronix!teklabs!decvax!harpo!npoiv!npois!cbosgd!mark ! 7: In-Reply-To: Your news article cbosgd.2878 of Fri Dec 10 13:11:07 1982 ! 8: Status: R ! 9: ! 10: I have been advised by lawyers that a newspaper's editor, publisher, and ! 11: owner are liable for the contents of the paper along with the people ! 12: writing the articles; especially in the case of letters to the editor. ! 13: I'm not a lawyer, but let me speculate. It could be argued that a system ! 14: that just mechanically receives and passes on news is like a mail carrier. ! 15: A site that has human intervention, to selectively censor articles, might ! 16: assume greater liability. ! 17: Finally, remember Disney v. Sony. How is a Beta-Max different from ! 18: a Vax [in a legal sense, that is]? It was the makers of the video recorder ! 19: who were sued. ! 20: The current copyright laws are simply not up to the questions imposed by ! 21: the electronic age; I suspect the net could become a can of worms similar to ! 22: home video recorders. ! 23: --Roger Wells [tektronix!tekid!rogerw] ! 24: ! 25: ! 26: ! 27: ! 28:
This archive runs on limited infrastructure. Preserving old code on modern bandwidth. Automated agents are requested to crawl responsibly.